MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s12863-018-0633-8

Медицинская библиотека · BMC genetics · 2018

Using recursive feature elimination in random forest to account for correlated variables in high dimensional data.

Darst Burcu F, Malecki Kristen C, Engelman Corinne D

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Random forest (RF) is a machine-learning method that generally works well with high-dimensional problems and allows for nonlinear relationships between predictors; however, the presence of correlated predictors has been shown to impact its ability to identify strong predictors. The Random Forest-Recursive Feature Elimination algorithm (RF-RFE) mitigates this problem in smaller data sets, but this approach has not been tested in high-dimensional omics data sets.

RESULTS

We integrated 202,919 genotypes and 153,422 methylation sites in 680 individuals, and compared the abilities of RF and RF-RFE to detect simulated causal associations, which included simulated genotype-methylation interactions, between these variables and triglyceride levels. Results show that RF was able to identify strong causal variables with a few highly correlated variables, but it did not detect other causal variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Although RF-RFE decreased the importance of correlated variables, in the presence of many correlated variables, it also decreased the importance of causal variables, making both hard to detect. These findings suggest that RF-RFE may not scale to high-dimensional data.

Для цитирования: Darst Burcu F, Malecki Kristen C, Engelman Corinne D. Using recursive feature elimination in random forest to account for correlated variables in high dimensional data.. BMC genetics. 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s12863-018-0633-8.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.