MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3347/kjp.2013.51.5.545

Медицинская библиотека · The Korean journal of parasitology · 2013

An autochthonous case of canine visceral leishmaniasis in Korea.

Bhang Dong Ha, Choi Ul Soo, Kim Hyun Jeong, Cho Kyoung-Oh, Shin Sung-Shik, Youn Hee-Jeong, Hwang Cheol-Yong, Youn Hwa-Young

Клинический случайСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

A 12-year-old spayed female mixed-bred dog presented with nasal bleeding of 2 days duration and a skin nodule in the left flank. No abnormalities were found in coagulation profiles and blood pressure. Cytological evaluation of the nodule revealed numerous characteristic round organisms having a nucleus and a bar within macrophages and in the background, consistent with leishmaniasis. In vitro culture was unsuccessful but PCR of the nodular aspirate identified the organisms as Leishmania infantum, and the final diagnosis was canine leishmaniasis. No history of travel to endemic countries was noted. Because the dog had received a blood transfusion 2 years before the illness, serological screening tests were performed in all donor dogs of the commercial blood bank using the commercial Leishmania ELISA test kit, and there were no positive results. Additional 113 dogs with hyperglobulinemia from Seoul were also screened with the same kits but no positive results were obtained. To the best of the author's knowledge this is the first autochthonous case of canine leishmaniasis in Korea.

Для цитирования: Bhang Dong Ha, Choi Ul Soo, Kim Hyun Jeong, Cho Kyoung-Oh, Shin Sung-Shik, Youn Hee-Jeong, Hwang Cheol-Yong, Youn Hwa-Young. An autochthonous case of canine visceral leishmaniasis in Korea.. The Korean journal of parasitology. 2013. DOI: 10.3347/kjp.2013.51.5.545.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.