MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.01.030

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of surgery · 2017

Percutaneous cholecystostomy in the management of high-risk patients presenting with acute cholecystitis: Timing and outcome at a single institution.

Zarour Shiri, Imam Ashraf, Kouniavsky Guennadi, Lin Guy, Zbar Andrew, Mavor Eli

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Cholecystectomy is the standard of care in acute cholecystitis (AC). Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is an effective alternative for high-risk surgical cases.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis is presented of AC patients treated with PC drainage at a single tertiary institution over a 21 month period, assessing outcome and complications.

RESULTS

Of 119 patients, 103 had clinical improvement after PC insertion. There were 7 peri-procedural deaths (5.9%), all in elderly high-risk cases. Overall, 56/103 cases (54%) were definitively managed with PC drainage with 41 patients (40%) undergoing an elective cholecystectomy (75% performed laparoscopically). The timing of PC insertion did not affect AC resolution or drain-related complications, although more patients underwent an elective cholecystectomy if PC placement was delayed (>24 h after admission).

CONCLUSIONS

In AC, drainage by a PC catheter is a safe and effective procedure. It may be used either as a bridge to elective cholecystectomy or in selected cases as definitive therapy.

Для цитирования: Zarour Shiri, Imam Ashraf, Kouniavsky Guennadi, Lin Guy, Zbar Andrew, Mavor Eli. Percutaneous cholecystostomy in the management of high-risk patients presenting with acute cholecystitis: Timing and outcome at a single institution.. American journal of surgery. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.01.030.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.