Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2019
Real-world outcomes of ventricular tachycardia catheter ablation with versus without intracardiac echocardiography.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Field Michael E, Gold Michael R, Reynolds Matthew R, Goldstein Laura, Lee Stephanie Hsiao Yu, Kalsekar Iftekhar, Coplan Paul, Wong Charlene, Khanna Rahul, Winterfield Jeffrey R
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: By providing real-time monitoring of catheter-tissue interface and for complications, intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) during catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) may improve outcomes. To test this hypothesis, we compared 12-month readmission rates (all-cause, cardiovascular [CV]-related, and VT-related), repeat ablation, and complications among patients with VT with structural heart disease undergoing ablation with versus without ICE.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the 2008-2017 IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases, patients with a history of implantable cardioverter defibrillator/cardiac resynchronization therapy (ICD/CRT-D) who underwent VT ablation with and without ICE use were identified. Propensity matching was performed and regression analysis was used to compare outcomes. After matching, 1324 patients were identified (ICE: 662; non-ICE: 662). The rate of 12-month VT-related readmission (18.13% vs 22.51%; P < .05) and repeat VT ablation (14.35% vs 19.34%; P = .02) postindex discharge were lower among patients in the ICE group compared with the non-ICE group, with a 24% lower risk of 12-month VT-related readmission (odds ratio [OR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-0.99) and a 30% lower risk of repeat ablation (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52-0.93) vs non-ICE group. The 12-month all-cause (44.56% vs 43.20%; P = .62) and CV-related readmissions (35.20% vs 32.93%; P = 0.38) and complication rates were not significantly different between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: VT ablation using ICE was associated with a lower likelihood of 12-month VT-related readmission and repeat ablation compared with non-ICE patients.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the 2008-2017 IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases, patients with a history of implantable cardioverter defibrillator/cardiac resynchronization therapy (ICD/CRT-D) who underwent VT ablation with and without ICE use were identified. Propensity matching was performed and regression analysis was used to compare outcomes. After matching, 1324 patients were identified (ICE: 662; non-ICE: 662). The rate of 12-month VT-related readmission (18.13% vs 22.51%; P < .05) and repeat VT ablation (14.35% vs 19.34%; P = .02) postindex discharge were lower among patients in the ICE group compared with the non-ICE group, with a 24% lower risk of 12-month VT-related readmission (odds ratio [OR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-0.99) and a 30% lower risk of repeat ablation (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52-0.93) vs non-ICE group. The 12-month all-cause (44.56% vs 43.20%; P = .62) and CV-related readmissions (35.20% vs 32.93%; P = 0.38) and complication rates were not significantly different between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: VT ablation using ICE was associated with a lower likelihood of 12-month VT-related readmission and repeat ablation compared with non-ICE patients.