MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/jhm.430

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of hospital medicine · 2009

Rapid response: a quality improvement conundrum.

Prado Renata, Albert Richard K, Mehler Philip S, Chu Eugene S

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Many in-hospital cardiac arrests and other adverse events are heralded by warning signs that are evident in the preceding 6 to 8 hours. By promptly intervening before further deterioration occurs, rapid response teams (RRTs) are designed to decrease unexpected intensive care unit (ICU) transfers, cardiac arrests, and inpatient mortality. While implementing RRTs is 1 of the 6 initiatives recommended by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, data supporting their effectiveness is equivocal. Before implementing an RRT in our institution, we reviewed cases of failure to rescue and found that (1) poor outcomes were often associated with attempts to manage early decompensations without a bedside evaluation, and (2) the common causes of decompensation for floor patients (early sepsis, aspiration, pulmonary embolism) were within the scope of our primary teams' practice. Therefore, we felt that prompt, mandatory bedside evaluations by the primary team would decrease untoward outcomes.

Для цитирования: Prado Renata, Albert Richard K, Mehler Philip S, Chu Eugene S. Rapid response: a quality improvement conundrum.. Journal of hospital medicine. 2009. DOI: 10.1002/jhm.430.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.