Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2020
Dietary stearic acid and palmitic acid do not differently affect ABCA1-mediated cholesterol efflux capacity in healthy men and postmenopausal women: A randomized controlled trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
van Rooijen Merel A, Plat Jogchum, Blom Wendy A M, Zock Peter L, Mensink Ronald P
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The saturated fatty acid stearic acid (C18:0) lowers HDL cholesterol compared with palmitic acid (C16:0). However, the ability of HDL particles to promote cholesterol efflux from macrophages (cholesterol efflux capacity; CEC) may better predict coronary heart disease (CHD) risk than HDL cholesterol concentrations.
OBJECTIVE: We examined effects of exchanging dietary palmitic acid for stearic acid on ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1)-mediated CEC, and other conventional and emerging cardiometabolic risk makers.
DESIGN: In a double-blind, randomized, crossover study with two 4-week isocaloric intervention periods, 34 healthy men and postmenopausal women (61.5 ± 5.7 years, BMI: 25.4 ± 2.5 kg/m2) followed diets rich in palmitic acids or stearic acids. Difference in intakes was 6% of daily energy. ABCA1-mediated CEC was measured from J774 macrophages to apolipoprotein (apo)B-depleted serum.
RESULTS: Compared with the palmitic-acid diet, the stearic-acid diet lowered serum LDL cholesterol (-0.14 mmol/L; p = 0.010), HDL cholesterol (-0.09 mmol/L; p=<0.001), and apoA1 (-0.05 g/L; p < 0.001). ABCA1-mediated CEC did not differ between diets (p = 0.280). Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) mass was higher on stearic acid (0.11 mg/L; p = 0.003), but CETP activity was comparable. ApoB100 did not differ, but triacylglycerol concentrations tended to be higher on stearic acid (p = 0.100). Glucose concentrations were comparable. Effects on insulin and C-peptide were sex-dependent. In women, the stearic-acid diet increased insulin concentrations (1.57 μU/mL; p = 0.002), while in men, C-peptide concentrations were lower (-0.15 ng/mL; p = 0.037). Interleukin 6 (0.15 pg/mL; p = 0.039) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (0.18 pg/mL; p = 0.005), but not high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, were higher on stearic acid. Soluble intracellular adhesion molecule (9 ng/mL; p = 0.033), but not soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule and endothelial-selectin concentrations decreased after stearic-acid consumption.
CONCLUSIONS: As expected, stearic-acid intake lowered LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and apoA1. Insulin sensitivity in women and low-grade inflammation might be unfavorably affected by stearic-acid intake. However, palmitic-acid and stearic-acid intakes did not differently affect ABCA1-mediated CEC.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02835651.
OBJECTIVE: We examined effects of exchanging dietary palmitic acid for stearic acid on ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1)-mediated CEC, and other conventional and emerging cardiometabolic risk makers.
DESIGN: In a double-blind, randomized, crossover study with two 4-week isocaloric intervention periods, 34 healthy men and postmenopausal women (61.5 ± 5.7 years, BMI: 25.4 ± 2.5 kg/m2) followed diets rich in palmitic acids or stearic acids. Difference in intakes was 6% of daily energy. ABCA1-mediated CEC was measured from J774 macrophages to apolipoprotein (apo)B-depleted serum.
RESULTS: Compared with the palmitic-acid diet, the stearic-acid diet lowered serum LDL cholesterol (-0.14 mmol/L; p = 0.010), HDL cholesterol (-0.09 mmol/L; p=<0.001), and apoA1 (-0.05 g/L; p < 0.001). ABCA1-mediated CEC did not differ between diets (p = 0.280). Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) mass was higher on stearic acid (0.11 mg/L; p = 0.003), but CETP activity was comparable. ApoB100 did not differ, but triacylglycerol concentrations tended to be higher on stearic acid (p = 0.100). Glucose concentrations were comparable. Effects on insulin and C-peptide were sex-dependent. In women, the stearic-acid diet increased insulin concentrations (1.57 μU/mL; p = 0.002), while in men, C-peptide concentrations were lower (-0.15 ng/mL; p = 0.037). Interleukin 6 (0.15 pg/mL; p = 0.039) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (0.18 pg/mL; p = 0.005), but not high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, were higher on stearic acid. Soluble intracellular adhesion molecule (9 ng/mL; p = 0.033), but not soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule and endothelial-selectin concentrations decreased after stearic-acid consumption.
CONCLUSIONS: As expected, stearic-acid intake lowered LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and apoA1. Insulin sensitivity in women and low-grade inflammation might be unfavorably affected by stearic-acid intake. However, palmitic-acid and stearic-acid intakes did not differently affect ABCA1-mediated CEC.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02835651.