MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/pathogens14030216

Медицинская библиотека · Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025

Efficacy and Safety of Sotrovimab Versus Oral Antiviral for Early Treatment in High-Risk Patients in Omicron Era: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Russo Antonio, Pisaturo Mariantonietta, Cacace Chiara, Troise Augusta, Granata Gabriele, Grimaldi Pierantonio, Allegorico Enrico, Ambrisi Francesca, Papillo Martina, Numis Fabio Giuliano, Coppola Nicola

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

High-risk patients with COVID-19 benefit from early treatment to prevent severe outcomes. Sotrovimab, a monoclonal antibody, and oral antivirals such as nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir have been used for early intervention, but their comparative efficacy and safety, particularly during the Omicron-dominant phase, require further evaluation.

METHODS

A multicenter, retrospective study performed in southern Italy including all adult patients who received early antiviral treatment (sotrovimab or nirmatrelvir/r or molnupiravir) between January 2022 and February 2024 (omicron phase). Demographic, clinical, and treatment-related data were analyzed to assess primary endpoints of 28-day mortality and hospitalization. Logistic regression models identified predictors of key outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 668 high-risk patients treated with sotrovimab (n = 326) or oral antivirals (n = 342: 69 with molnupiravir and 273 with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir) were included. There was no significant difference in 28-day mortality between groups (0.8% sotrovimab vs. 1.8% oral antivirals; p = 0.679). However, patients treated with sotrovimab exhibited a longer median time to SARS-CoV-2 negativization (13 vs. 11 days; p = 0.008) and higher non-COVID-19-related hospitalizations (2.45% vs. 0%; p = 0.003). Multivariable analysis identified cardiovascular or cerebrovascular diseases as the sole significant predictor of prolonged viral positivity (OR 1.585, 95% CI 1.072-2.345; p = 0.021). Additionally, immunocompromised status (OR 16.929, 95% CI 1.835-156.170; p = 0.013) and chronic non-COVID-19 oxygen therapy (OR 10.714, 95% CI 1.623-70.725; p = 0.014) were strongly associated with mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Sotrovimab and oral antivirals demonstrated similar efficacy in preventing mortality and hospitalization among high-risk patients. Patient-specific factors, particularly cardiovascular comorbidities and immunosuppression, significantly influenced outcomes and should guide treatment choices.

Для цитирования: Russo Antonio, Pisaturo Mariantonietta, Cacace Chiara, Troise Augusta, Granata Gabriele, Grimaldi Pierantonio, Allegorico Enrico, Ambrisi Francesca, Papillo Martina, Numis Fabio Giuliano, Coppola Nicola. Efficacy and Safety of Sotrovimab Versus Oral Antiviral for Early Treatment in High-Risk Patients in Omicron Era: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland). 2025. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens14030216.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.