MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.21500/20112084.5292

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of psychological research · 2022

Assessment in Schizotypy: A Systematic Review Towards Clinical and Personality Models.

Rivera Tapia Cristhian Javier

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

research carried out regarding the psychological concept of schizotypy responds to a field of extensive development since its conceptualization decades ago, which includes schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) and schizotypal personality disorder (SPD). However, controversies still persist marked by the difficulty of establishing definitive consensus.

OBJECTIVE

the research purpose aimed to synthesize the empirical evidence involved in the use of various methodologies and tools for understanding schizotypy.

METHODOLOGY: A systematic review was carried out in the following databases: Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Taylor and Francis, Wiley, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and PsycNet. By using the PRISMA guidelines, 65 studies published in the last decade (2010-2020) were discriminated.

RESULTS

The synthesis of cumulative knowledge made it possible to define schizotypy as an integrating multidimensional construct and to identify valid assessment tools in use, in its psychometric, clinical, and personality characterizations.

DISCUSSION/

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical implications found in these reports are addressed, as well as notions of the continuum of psychoses, taxonomic, and multidimensional models.

Для цитирования: Rivera Tapia Cristhian Javier. Assessment in Schizotypy: A Systematic Review Towards Clinical and Personality Models.. International journal of psychological research. 2022. DOI: 10.21500/20112084.5292.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.