Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2009
Inter-observer agreement on acne severity based on facial photographs.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Beylot C, Chivot M, Faure M, Pawin H, Poli F, Revuz J, Auffret N, Moyse D, Dréno B, Groupe Expert Acné
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The three-grade acne classification (mild, moderate, severe) is widely used to define the licensed indications of acne treatments, and for therapeutic decision-making in clinical practice, but its reproducibility has never been assessed.
METHODS: Ten photographs of facial acne were scored independently by eight experts using the three-grade acne classification. We conducted a descriptive analysis of the results, based on graphical representation of the scores for each photograph.
RESULTS: Inter-observer agreement on acne severity based on the three-grade acne classification was very poor.
CONCLUSION: The classical three-grade acne classification is poorly reproducible. A new rating tool accompanied by a clinical description of each severity level would be extremely useful.
METHODS: Ten photographs of facial acne were scored independently by eight experts using the three-grade acne classification. We conducted a descriptive analysis of the results, based on graphical representation of the scores for each photograph.
RESULTS: Inter-observer agreement on acne severity based on the three-grade acne classification was very poor.
CONCLUSION: The classical three-grade acne classification is poorly reproducible. A new rating tool accompanied by a clinical description of each severity level would be extremely useful.