MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10840-018-0363-x

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2018

Cardiac resynchronization therapy response in heart failure patients with different subtypes of true left bundle branch block.

García-Seara Javier, Iglesias Alvarez Diego, Alvarez Alvarez Belen, Gude Sampedro Francisco, Martínez Sande Jose L, Rodríguez-Mañero Moisés, Kreidieh Bahij, Fernández-López Xesus Alberte, González Melchor Laila, González Juanatey José Ramón

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) configuration has been described as a predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We investigated whether different subtypes of true LBBB configuration could help select patients with better response and clinical outcome.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 198 consecutive LBBB patients implanted with a CRT. True LBBB was defined using the Strauss and the Predict study criteria. Echocardiographic response was evaluated by the reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) and the increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Clinical response was defined as an improvement in one category of the NYHA functional class.

RESULTS

Patients with true LBBB had a greater improvement in both LVESV reduction (median = - 27.6%, interquartile range = [- 4.9, - 50.1]) and LVEF increase (median 10.8 ± 10) than those with non-true LBBB (- 19.7%, [16.7, - 48.0]) p = 0.04 and 5.1 ± 10, p = 0.03, respectively. No differences were exhibited between true LBBB Strauss group (- 26.7%, [- 11.0, - 46.9]) and true LBBB Predict group (- 26.6%, [- 15.9, - 39.4]). There were no statistically significant differences in the percentage of patients with clinical response, assessed by NYHA improvement, among all groups. In the Cox model for death, age, ischemic etiology, and ΔLVESV were independent predictors of mortality. True LBBB (Strauss + Predict) patients had a trend towards lower mortality than non-true LBBB [HR = 0.55, 95% CI = (0.22-1.15)], p = 0.08. In the Cox model for HF hospitalization, age, sex male, prior LVEF, and ΔLVESV were independent predictors. True LBBB (Strauss + Predict) patients had a significantly lower risk of developing HF hospitalization than those with non-true LBBB [0.45 (0.21-0.90)], p = 0.029.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with true LBBB, either Strauss or Predict criteria, had greater echocardiographic response and lower incidence of HF hospitalization than non-true LBBB when implanted with CRT.

Для цитирования: García-Seara Javier, Iglesias Alvarez Diego, Alvarez Alvarez Belen, Gude Sampedro Francisco, Martínez Sande Jose L, Rodríguez-Mañero Moisés, Kreidieh Bahij, Fernández-López Xesus Alberte, González Melchor Laila, González Juanatey José Ramón. Cardiac resynchronization therapy response in heart failure patients with different subtypes of true left bundle branch block.. Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing. 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s10840-018-0363-x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.