MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2800

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2024

Nonextraction Management of Severe Crowding in a Growing Patient with Borderline Malocclusion: Case Report.

Rajan Ahana S, Parameswaran Ratna, Rajkumar Balaji, Vijayalakshmi Devaki

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: A borderline case presents with mild skeletal disharmony or orthodontic problems due to arch length discrepancy and migration of teeth or a combination of these but is masked by a balanced soft tissue relationship. This case report describes one such borderline case of a 13-year-old girl who complained of irregularly placed upper and lower front teeth. Extraoral examination revealed balanced soft tissue with a mild convex profile, competent lips, and an average nasolabial angle. Intraorally, she had mixed dentition with flush terminal in primary molars and a class I relation in the permanent molars, severe crowding in the lower anterior, and congenitally missing permanent right laterals. A nonextraction protocol was followed, harnessing the pubertal growth spurt to alleviate the crowding and thereby preserving the soft tissue harmony.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Rajan AS, Parameswaran R, Rajkumar B, et al. Nonextraction Management of Severe Crowding in a Growing Patient with Borderline Malocclusion: Case Report. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(4):472-478.

Для цитирования: Rajan Ahana S, Parameswaran Ratna, Rajkumar Balaji, Vijayalakshmi Devaki. Nonextraction Management of Severe Crowding in a Growing Patient with Borderline Malocclusion: Case Report.. International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry. 2024. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2800.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.