MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_953_23

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024

Knowledge, Attitude and Perception Regarding Myofunctional Appliance among Children-Prospective Study of Parents' View.

Valliappan Subramanian, Megalaa N, Annamalai Indra, Vidhya G, Subbiah Gireesh K, Ranjith K, Nagappan Nagappan

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIM: The current purpose of the survey is to completely evaluate parents' attitudes, knowledge, and perceptions of myofunctional appliances.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Parents in Chennai participated in this cross-sectional web-based questionnaire survey. Pilot study was carried out to determine the sample size, and 500 individuals were the final sample size. The 10 organized, predesigned, and validated questions are on awareness of myofunctional appliance.

RESULTS

The result of the survey showed that in 500 subjects, 79.8% were aware of skeletal problems. The proportion of parents willing to recommend the use of such treatments is about 70%, while 69% believe that myofunctional appliances are important in correcting skeletal problems.

CONCLUSION

The present study has established that most parents know about the functional appliance and have an understanding of how to distinguish between skeletal problems. In order to diagnose skeletal issues in an appropriate age range for the individual, more awareness about appliances is necessary and needs to be developed.

Для цитирования: Valliappan Subramanian, Megalaa N, Annamalai Indra, Vidhya G, Subbiah Gireesh K, Ranjith K, Nagappan Nagappan. Knowledge, Attitude and Perception Regarding Myofunctional Appliance among Children-Prospective Study of Parents' View.. Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences. 2024. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_953_23.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.