MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug · 2010

Patch testing practices of American Contact Dermatitis Society members.

Schleichert Rachel A, Hostetler Sarah G, Zirwas Matthew J

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Patch testing is an important part of diagnosing allergic contact dermatitis although there is much variability in methodology among practitioners.

OBJECTIVE

We surveyed members of the American Contact Dermatitis Society (ACDS) to quantify time spent with patients with contact dermatitis; to characterize patch testing practices, including the Thin-Layer Rapid Use Epicutaneous (T.R.U.E.) Test; and to assess utilization of the Contact Allergen Replacement Database (CARD).

METHODS

An electronic survey was sent to all members of the ACDS.

RESULTS

Our survey was sent to the 600 members of the ACDS; 100 members participated (a response rate of 16.6%). Respondents used patch testing trays that contained an average of 62 allergens; 68% of respondents used the North American Contact Dermatitis Group series, and only 9% used the T.R.U.E. Test. Respondents' biggest criticism of the T.R.U.E. Test was its low number of allergens, and 94% of respondents used CARD regularly.

CONCLUSION

ACDS members used patch testing trays with many allergens. Despite the T.R.U.E. Test's popularity among general dermatologists and allergists, few ACDS members used it. Routine CARD usage should be encouraged.

Для цитирования: Schleichert Rachel A, Hostetler Sarah G, Zirwas Matthew J. Patch testing practices of American Contact Dermatitis Society members.. Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug. 2010.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.