MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.016

Медицинская библиотека · JACC. Cardiovascular interventions · 2013

Effect of radial versus femoral access on radiation dose and the importance of procedural volume: a substudy of the multicenter randomized RIVAL trial.

Jolly Sanjit S, Cairns John, Niemela Kari, Steg Philippe Gabriel, Natarajan Madhu K, Cheema Asim N, Rao Sunil V, Cantor Warren J, Džavík Vladimír, Budaj Andrzej, Sheth Tej, Valentin Vicent, Fung Anthony, Widimsky Petr, Ferrari Emile, Gao Peggy, Jedrzejowski Barbara, Mehta Shamir R, RIVAL Investigators

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to compare the radiation dose between radial and femoral access.

BACKGROUND

Small trials have shown an increase in the radiation dose with radial compared with femoral access, but many were performed during the operators' learning curve of radial access.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to radial or femoral access, as a part of the RIVAL (RadIal Vs. femorAL) trial (N = 7,021). Fluoroscopy time was prospectively collected in 5740 patients and radiation dose quantified as air kerma in 1,445 patients and dose-area product (DAP) in 2,255 patients.

RESULTS

Median fluoroscopy time was higher with radial versus femoral access (9.3 vs. 8.0 min, p < 0.001). Median air kerma was nominally higher with radial versus femoral access (1,046 vs. 930 mGy, respectively, p = 0.051). Median DAP was not different between radial and femoral access (52.8 Gy-cm(2) vs. 51.2 Gy·cm(2), p = 0.83). When results are stratified according to procedural volume, air kerma was increased only in the lowest tertile of radial volume centers (low 1,425 vs. 1,045 mGy, p = 0.002; middle 987 vs. 958 mGy, p = 0.597; high 652 vs. 621 mGy, p = 0.403, interaction p = 0.026). Multivariable regression showed procedural volume was the greatest independent predictor of lower air kerma dose (ratio of geometric means 0.55; 95% confidence interval 0.49 to 0.61 for highest-volume radial centers).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation dose as measured by air kerma was nominally higher with radial versus femoral access, but differences were present only in lower-volume centers and operators. High-volume centers have the lowest radiation dose irrespective of which access site approach that they use. (A Trial of Trans-radial Versus Trans-femoral Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Access Site Approach in Patients With Unstable Angina or Myocardial Infarction Managed With an Invasive Strategy [RIVAL]; NCT01014273).

Для цитирования: Jolly Sanjit S, Cairns John, Niemela Kari, Steg Philippe Gabriel, Natarajan Madhu K, Cheema Asim N, Rao Sunil V, Cantor Warren J, Džavík Vladimír, Budaj Andrzej, Sheth Tej, Valentin Vicent, Fung Anthony, Widimsky Petr, Ferrari Emile, Gao Peggy, Jedrzejowski Barbara, Mehta Shamir R, RIVAL Investigators. Effect of radial versus femoral access on radiation dose and the importance of procedural volume: a substudy of the multicenter randomized RIVAL trial.. JACC. Cardiovascular interventions. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.016.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.