Medicine and science in sports and exercise · 2022
Effects of Eccentric Resistance Training on Lower-Limb Passive Joint Range of Motion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
МетаанализСистематический обзорСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kay Anthony D, Baxter Brett A, Hill Mathew W, Blazevich Anthony J
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Substantial increases in joint range of motion (ROM) have been reported after eccentric resistance training; however, between-study variability and sample size issues complicate the interpretation of the magnitude of effect.
METHODS: PubMed, Medline, and SPORTDiscus databases were searched for studies examining the effects of eccentric training on lower-limb passive joint ROM in healthy human participants. Meta-analysis used an inverse-variance random-effects model to calculate the pooled standardized difference (Hedge's g ) with 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS: Meta-analysis of 22 ROM outcomes (17 studies, 376 participants) revealed a large increase in lower-limb passive joint ROM ( g = 0.86 (95% confidence intervals, 0.65-1.08)). Subgroup analyses revealed a moderate increase after 4-5 wk ( g = 0.63 (0.27-0.98)), large increase after 6-8 wk ( g = 0.98 (0.73-1.24)), and moderate increase after 9-14 wk ( g = 0.75 (0.03, 1.46)) of training. Large increases were found in dorsiflexion ( g = 1.12 (0.78-1.47)) and knee extension ( g = 0.82 (0.48-1.17)), but a small increase in knee flexion was observed ( g = 0.41 (0.05-0.77)). A large increase was found after isokinetic ( g = 1.07 (0.59-1.54)) and moderate increase after isotonic ( g = 0.77 (0.56-0.99)) training.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the potential of eccentric training as an effective flexibility training intervention and provide evidence for "best practice" guidelines. The larger effect after isokinetic training despite <50% training sessions being performed is suggestive of a more effective exercise mode, although further research is needed to determine the influence of contraction intensity and to confirm the efficacy of eccentric training in clinical populations.
METHODS: PubMed, Medline, and SPORTDiscus databases were searched for studies examining the effects of eccentric training on lower-limb passive joint ROM in healthy human participants. Meta-analysis used an inverse-variance random-effects model to calculate the pooled standardized difference (Hedge's g ) with 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS: Meta-analysis of 22 ROM outcomes (17 studies, 376 participants) revealed a large increase in lower-limb passive joint ROM ( g = 0.86 (95% confidence intervals, 0.65-1.08)). Subgroup analyses revealed a moderate increase after 4-5 wk ( g = 0.63 (0.27-0.98)), large increase after 6-8 wk ( g = 0.98 (0.73-1.24)), and moderate increase after 9-14 wk ( g = 0.75 (0.03, 1.46)) of training. Large increases were found in dorsiflexion ( g = 1.12 (0.78-1.47)) and knee extension ( g = 0.82 (0.48-1.17)), but a small increase in knee flexion was observed ( g = 0.41 (0.05-0.77)). A large increase was found after isokinetic ( g = 1.07 (0.59-1.54)) and moderate increase after isotonic ( g = 0.77 (0.56-0.99)) training.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the potential of eccentric training as an effective flexibility training intervention and provide evidence for "best practice" guidelines. The larger effect after isokinetic training despite <50% training sessions being performed is suggestive of a more effective exercise mode, although further research is needed to determine the influence of contraction intensity and to confirm the efficacy of eccentric training in clinical populations.