MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1590/s1516-44462011000100015

Медицинская библиотека · Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999) · 2011

[The pharmacological treatment of bipolar disorder: a systematic and critical review of the methodological aspects of modern clinical trials].

Cheniaux Elie

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To review systematically the main clinical trials on the pharmacological treatment of bipolar disorder and to make a critical analysis of their methodological aspects.

METHOD: A search in Medline, ISI and PsycINFO databases was conducted, using the following search terms: "bipolar", "randomized", "placebo" e "controlled". Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials on the pharmacological treatment of bipolar disorder were selected. Besides, according to our criteria, samples had to consist of at least 100 patients and experimental drug had to be used as monotherapy.

RESULTS

34 articles met our selection criteria. All drugs currently indicated for mania, bipolar depression and maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder were more effective than placebo in at least one clinical trial. However, these studies had highly selected samples, high dropout rates and low response rates.

CONCLUSION

Modern clinical trials on pharmacological treatment of bipolar disorder have important methodological limitations. So, their results should be taken with caution.

Для цитирования: Cheniaux Elie. [The pharmacological treatment of bipolar disorder: a systematic and critical review of the methodological aspects of modern clinical trials].. Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999). 2011. DOI: 10.1590/s1516-44462011000100015.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.