m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
La Revue du praticien · 2012

["Local" or "mobile" screening for diabetic retinopathy in general practice by non-mydriatic digital cameras? about the Diabetes Midi-Pyrénées network activity between 2005 and 2010].

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Bismuth Pierre, Bismuth Michel, Dupouy Julie, Rougé-Bugat Marie-Eve, Poutrain Jean-Christophe, Escourrou Brigitte, Hanaire Hélène, Oustric Stéphane

Аннотация

Fundus photographs using non-mydriatic digital cameras for diabetic retinopathy screening have been studied in France during the past 10 years. Nevertheless, the different screening modalities have not been compared. The main goal of this study was to compare patient recruitment with two different screening modalities, and secondarily to compare diagnostic effectiveness and cost. A retrospective study analyzed data from the Diabetes Midi Pyrenees Network in 2005 and between 2006 and 2010. In 2005, a vehicle with digital camera traveled through a rural department in order to screen diabetic patients whose last fundus examination was performed greater than 1 year previously. Between 2006 and 2010, general practitioners sent their diabetic patients whose last fundus examination was performed greater than 1 year previously to a "Локально" screening site. In the two cases, fundus photographs were made by trained operator at screening site and analyzed by an ophthalmologist. The "mobile" screening recruited 698 patients, and the "Локально" screening 345 patients. Patients recruited by "mobile" screening were older than those recruited by "Локально" screening. They were preferentially men and suffered from diabetes from far longer The diagnostic performance of "Локально" screening was 26.8%, and it was 28.6% for "mobile" screening (p = 0.47). The cost of screening was higher for "mobile" screening: 116 Euro against 61 Euro for "Локально" screening. "Mobile" screening could allow more patient recruitment than "Локально" screening when geographic and demographic constraints are more important.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты