MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s12888-016-1044-x

Медицинская библиотека · BMC psychiatry · 2016

How anorexia nervosa patients with high and low autistic traits respond to group Cognitive Remediation Therapy.

Tchanturia Kate, Larsson Emma, Adamson James

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The current study aimed to evaluate group Cognitive remediation therapy (CRT) inpatients with Anorexia Nervosa (AN). We aimed to examine the treatment response of group CRT in AN patients with high or low levels of autistic traits.

METHODS

Thirty-five in patients with an AN diagnosis received group CRT intervention for 6 sessions in a national eating disorder unit. All participants completed self-report questionnaires on thinking styles and motivation before and after the intervention.

RESULTS

Patients with low autistic traits had statistically significant medium size effect improvements in self-reported thinking style scales as well as confidence (ability) to change. Patients with high autistic traits showed no statistically significant improvements in any outcome measure.

CONCLUSIONS

The brief group format CRT intervention improves self-reported cognitive and motivational aspects in people with AN without autistic traits. For patients with higher autistic traits brief group CRT does not improve self-reported cognitive style or motivation. This finding suggests that brief group format CRT might not be the best suited format for individuals with elevated autistic traits and individual or more tailored CRT should be explored.

Для цитирования: Tchanturia Kate, Larsson Emma, Adamson James. How anorexia nervosa patients with high and low autistic traits respond to group Cognitive Remediation Therapy.. BMC psychiatry. 2016. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-016-1044-x.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.