Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2023
Myocardial Flow Assessment After Heart Transplantation Using Dynamic Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography With 201Tl and 99mTc Tracers and Validated by 13N-NH3 Positron Emission Tomography.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ko Kuan-Yin, Ko Chi-Lun, Lee Chii-Ming, Cheng Ju-Shin, Wu Yen-Wen, Hsu Ron-Bin, Chen Yih-Sharng, Wang Shoei-Shen, Yen Ruoh-Fang, Cheng Mei-Fang
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is an obliterative and diffuse form of vasculopathy and is the most common cause of long-term cardiovascular mortality in heart transplant patients. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of 99mTc and 201Tl tracers in the assessment of CAV using cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) quantification, which was further validated using 13 N-NH3 positron emission tomography (PET).
METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with prior heart transplantation who underwent CZT SPECT and 13 N-NH3 PET dynamic scans were included in this study. CZT SPECT with 99mTc-sestamibi was used in the first 19 patients and 201Tl-chloride for the remaining patients. To determine the diagnostic accuracy of angiographically defined moderate-to-severe CAV, the analysis included patients who underwent angiographic examinations within 1 year of their second scan.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the patient characteristics between the 201Tl and 99mTc tracer groups. Both 201Tl and 99mTc CZT SPECT-derived stress MBF and MFR values globally and in 3 coronary territories showed good correlations with 13 N-NH3 PET. The 201Tl and 99mTc cohorts did not differ significantly in the correlation coefficients of CZT SPECT versus PET for MBF and MFR, except for stress MBF (201Tl:0.95 versus 99mTc:0.80, P=0.03). 201Tl and 99mTc CZT SPECT were satisfactory for detecting PET MFR <2.0 (201Tl area under the curve, 0.92 [0.71-0.99], 99mTc area under the curve, 0.87 [0.64-0.97]) and angiographically defined moderate-to-severe CAV, and CZT SPECT results were comparable to that of 13 N-NH3 PET (CZT area under the curve, 0.90 [0.70-0.99], PET area under the curve, 0.86 [0.64-0.97]).
CONCLUSIONS: This small study suggests that CZT SPECT using 201Tl and 99mTc tracers showed comparable MBF and MFR, and the results correlated well with those of 13 N-NH3 PET. Hence, CZT SPECT with 201Tl or 99mTc tracers can be used to detect moderate-to-severe CAV in patients with prior heart transplantation. However, validation using larger studies is warranted.
METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with prior heart transplantation who underwent CZT SPECT and 13 N-NH3 PET dynamic scans were included in this study. CZT SPECT with 99mTc-sestamibi was used in the first 19 patients and 201Tl-chloride for the remaining patients. To determine the diagnostic accuracy of angiographically defined moderate-to-severe CAV, the analysis included patients who underwent angiographic examinations within 1 year of their second scan.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the patient characteristics between the 201Tl and 99mTc tracer groups. Both 201Tl and 99mTc CZT SPECT-derived stress MBF and MFR values globally and in 3 coronary territories showed good correlations with 13 N-NH3 PET. The 201Tl and 99mTc cohorts did not differ significantly in the correlation coefficients of CZT SPECT versus PET for MBF and MFR, except for stress MBF (201Tl:0.95 versus 99mTc:0.80, P=0.03). 201Tl and 99mTc CZT SPECT were satisfactory for detecting PET MFR <2.0 (201Tl area under the curve, 0.92 [0.71-0.99], 99mTc area under the curve, 0.87 [0.64-0.97]) and angiographically defined moderate-to-severe CAV, and CZT SPECT results were comparable to that of 13 N-NH3 PET (CZT area under the curve, 0.90 [0.70-0.99], PET area under the curve, 0.86 [0.64-0.97]).
CONCLUSIONS: This small study suggests that CZT SPECT using 201Tl and 99mTc tracers showed comparable MBF and MFR, and the results correlated well with those of 13 N-NH3 PET. Hence, CZT SPECT with 201Tl or 99mTc tracers can be used to detect moderate-to-severe CAV in patients with prior heart transplantation. However, validation using larger studies is warranted.