MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10029-018-1732-1

Медицинская библиотека · Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2018

Outcomes of utilizing absorbable mesh as an adjunct to posterior sheath closure during complex posterior component separation.

Winder J S, Majumder A, Fayezizadeh M, Novitsky Y W, Pauli E M

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

A minority of patients undergoing posterior component separation (PCS) have abdominal wall defects that preclude complete reconstruction of the visceral sac with native tissue. The use of absorbable mesh bridges (AMB) to span such defects has not been established. We hypothesized that AMB use during posterior sheath closure of PCS is safe and provides favorable outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing PCS with AMB at two hernia centers. Main outcome measures included demographics, comorbidities, and post-operative complications.

RESULTS

36 patients were identified. Post-operative wound complications included five surgical site infections. At a median of 27 months, there were five recurrent hernias (13.9%), 2 of which were parastomal, but no episodes of intestinal obstruction/fistula.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilization of AMB for large posterior layer deficits results in acceptable rates of perioperative wound morbidity, effective PCS repairs, and does not increase intestinal morbidity or fistula formation.

Для цитирования: Winder J S, Majumder A, Fayezizadeh M, Novitsky Y W, Pauli E M. Outcomes of utilizing absorbable mesh as an adjunct to posterior sheath closure during complex posterior component separation.. Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery. 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-018-1732-1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.