Clinical and Radiologic Characteristics of Familial Pulmonary Fibrosis.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Grant-Orser Amanda, Marinescu Daniel-Costin, Hague Cameron J, Muller Nestor L, Murphy Darra T, Churg Andrew, Wright Joanne L, Al-Arnawoot Amna, Bilawich Ana-Maria, Bourgouin Patrick, Cox Gerard, Durand Celine, Elliot Tracy, Ellis Jennifer, Fisher Jolene H, Fladeland Derek, Goobie Gillian C, Guenther Zachary, Haider Ehsan, Hambly Nathan, Huynh James, Karjala Geoffrey, Khalil Nasreen, Kolb Martin, Leipsic Jonathon, Lok Stacey, Macisaac Sarah, Mcinnis Micheal, Manganas Helene, Marcoux Veronica, Mayo John, Morisset Julie, Scallan Ciaran, Sedlic Tony, Shapera Shane, Sun Kelly, Tan Victoria, Wong Alyson W, Zheng Boyang, Assayag Deborah, Newton Chad A, Lethebe Brendan C, Ryerson Christopher J, Johannson Kerri A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to characterize the clinical and radiological features of patients with FPF using a multicenter ILD registry. We compared lung function and transplant-free survival between patients with FPF and sporadic ILD, overall and by radiologic pattern.
METHODS: The multicenter Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis includes patients with fibrotic ILD. Demographics, forced vital capacity (FVC%), diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO%), and death or lung transplant data were collected. Family history was determined via physician or patient documentation. A subset underwent re-evaluation where baseline radiologic features and patterns were described. Statistical comparisons used chi-square tests, Cox proportional hazards, omnibus test and mixed models to assess outcomes.
RESULTS: Of 5375 patients, 719 (13%) had FPF. Demographics were similar between FPF and sporadic ILD. When grouping idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis and unclassifiable ILD together, those with FPF were younger (P < .001), more likely female (P < .001), less likely to have smoked (P = .007), and had higher baseline DLCO% (P < .001). Antifibrotics were more often prescribed to FPF patients with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, unclassifiable ILD, and systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease-ILD versus their sporadic counterparts. The mean annual rate of FVC% decline was greater in patients with FPF compared to those with sporadic ILD (P = .024). FPF more frequently received referral for transplant (P < .001), but transplant-free survival did not differ between FPF and sporadic disease. In the radiologic cohort (n = 1519) those with FPF had a higher likelihood of radiologic usual interstitial pneumonia than those with sporadic ILD (P = .004).
CONCLUSIONS: FPF accounts for a meaningful proportion of ILD cases and exhibits distinct clinical features in certain disease subtypes. Although survival outcomes were similar in this study, earlier onset and accelerated progression highlight the need for refined diagnostic and prognostic approaches to familial disease.