Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology · 2003
Cortical silent period in essential tremor.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shukla G, Bhatia M, Pandey R M, Behari M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Pathophysiology of essential tremor (ET) is controversial, current evidence indicating its genesis through a central oscillator and modulation by a peripheral component. Since transcranial magnetic stimulation induced silent period (SP) has been attributed mainly to intracortical inhibitory mechanisms, it has been found useful in assessing central motor disturbances.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To assess if the cortically induced SP was different in ET patients as compared to age matched healthy controls.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients of ET (mean age 45.4 +/- 14.9 years) diagnosed according to criteria of Louis et al (1998) and an equal number of healthy controls (mean age 36.2 +/- 15.7 years) were recruited in the study. Cortically induced (magnetic) SP were recorded according to the standard methods described. Student's "t" test and Wilcoxon sign rank test were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: The mean +/- SD cortical SP in ET patients (180.75 +/- 57.11 msec) in ET patients and in controls (163.83 +/- 35.65 msec) were statistically similar (p = 0.22).
CONCLUSION: Our study shows that there is no significant difference in mean cortical SPs in patients with ET as compared to controls.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To assess if the cortically induced SP was different in ET patients as compared to age matched healthy controls.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients of ET (mean age 45.4 +/- 14.9 years) diagnosed according to criteria of Louis et al (1998) and an equal number of healthy controls (mean age 36.2 +/- 15.7 years) were recruited in the study. Cortically induced (magnetic) SP were recorded according to the standard methods described. Student's "t" test and Wilcoxon sign rank test were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: The mean +/- SD cortical SP in ET patients (180.75 +/- 57.11 msec) in ET patients and in controls (163.83 +/- 35.65 msec) were statistically similar (p = 0.22).
CONCLUSION: Our study shows that there is no significant difference in mean cortical SPs in patients with ET as compared to controls.