BMC surgery · 2025
Measurement of the femoral neck anteversion angle using a three-dimensional reconstruction in the fixed coordinate system based on the basal anterior cortex of the femoral neck: an observational study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yang Ruibao, Lin Jie, Han Guibin, Jiang Guangliang, Deng Yingsheng
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study investigated the accessibility of 3D reconstruction in the fixed coordinate system(3D-R-FCS) based on the basal anterior cortex of the femoral neck in measuring the femoral neck anteversion angle (FNAA).
METHODS: CT and EOS examinations were performed on 40 femoral samples synthesized by Sawbone. Two evaluators were responsible for measurement of the FNAA based on four different methods, including EOS 3D reconstruction, 3D-R-FCS, Reikerås, and Murphy methods.
RESULTS: Measurement of the FNAA based on EOS, 3D-R-FCS based on the basal anterior cortex of the femoral neck, and the Reikerås and Murphy methods were 6.53°±4.28°, 7.08°±4.58°, 3.03°±4.44°, and 11.9°±4.91°, respectively. No statistical difference was detected for the FNAA measurements between EOS and the 3D-R-FCS based on the basal anterior cortex of the femoral neck (P > 0.05). However, a statistical difference was detected between the Reikerås and Murphy methods and EOS (P < 0.05). The value of the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the 4 methods measured by evaluator A were 0.89, 0.99, 0.75, and 0.81, respectively, while the ICCs measured by evaluator B were 0.91, 0.98, 0.71, and 0.79, respectively. The correlation coefficients between the two evaluators were 0.89, 0.99, 0.75, and 0.83, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The consistency of the scores for the FNAA measurement based on the 3D-R-FCS within and between the evaluators was the highest among the four methods and correlated well with the EOS measurement, which may potentially provide a more stable method for the measurement in clinical practice.
CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
METHODS: CT and EOS examinations were performed on 40 femoral samples synthesized by Sawbone. Two evaluators were responsible for measurement of the FNAA based on four different methods, including EOS 3D reconstruction, 3D-R-FCS, Reikerås, and Murphy methods.
RESULTS: Measurement of the FNAA based on EOS, 3D-R-FCS based on the basal anterior cortex of the femoral neck, and the Reikerås and Murphy methods were 6.53°±4.28°, 7.08°±4.58°, 3.03°±4.44°, and 11.9°±4.91°, respectively. No statistical difference was detected for the FNAA measurements between EOS and the 3D-R-FCS based on the basal anterior cortex of the femoral neck (P > 0.05). However, a statistical difference was detected between the Reikerås and Murphy methods and EOS (P < 0.05). The value of the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the 4 methods measured by evaluator A were 0.89, 0.99, 0.75, and 0.81, respectively, while the ICCs measured by evaluator B were 0.91, 0.98, 0.71, and 0.79, respectively. The correlation coefficients between the two evaluators were 0.89, 0.99, 0.75, and 0.83, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The consistency of the scores for the FNAA measurement based on the 3D-R-FCS within and between the evaluators was the highest among the four methods and correlated well with the EOS measurement, which may potentially provide a more stable method for the measurement in clinical practice.
CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.