MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.acra.2025.04.024

Медицинская библиотека · Academic radiology · 2025

A Comparative Bicentric Study on Ultrasound Education for Students: App- and AI-Supported Learning Versus Traditional Hands-on Instruction (AI-Teach Study).

Höhne Elena, Bauer Eva, Bauer Claus, Schäfer Valentin, Gotta Jennifer, Reschke Philipp, Vogl Thomas, Yel Ibrahim, Weimer Johannes, Wittek Agnes, Recker Florian

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into medical education presents significant opportunities for enhancing teaching methods and student learning outcomes. Despite its potential benefits, the implementation of AI in curricula remains limited and lacks standardized approaches.

OBJECTIVE

This bicentric pilot study aims to examine the effectiveness of an innovative ultrasound course for medical students that combines AI-based teaching with blended e-learning, compared to traditional classroom lessons, to optimize educational practices.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

This bicentric pilot study included medical students who were randomly assigned to an experimental group receiving AI-based blended e-learning for an ultrasound course or a control group receiving traditional classroom instruction. The curriculum consisted of two modules: lung ultrasound and Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST). The effectiveness of the interventions was evaluated using objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE) to assess ultrasound skills, administered as pre-tests and post-tests. Additionally, the quality of the ultrasound images obtained during the final assessment was rated using a standardized scoring system to further assess student competency.

RESULTS

50 clinical-phase medical students participated. OSCE results for both FAST and lung modules revealed no significant differences between groups at both pretest (pretest FAST p=0.722, pretest Lung p=0.062) and final exam (final exam FAST p=0.634, final exam lung p=0.843), with both cohorts achieving comparable improvements and nearly identical final scores, while ultrasound image evaluations confirmed similar outcomes (FAST images p=0.558 and lung images p=0.199) with excellent interrater reliability (ICC=0.993).

CONCLUSION

AI- and app-based learning methods in ultrasound education showed to be equally effective as traditional hands-on teaching for medical students in this study. Incorporating the permanently growing innovations auf AI into curricula can provide valuable tools for educators and students alike.

Для цитирования: Höhne Elena, Bauer Eva, Bauer Claus, Schäfer Valentin, Gotta Jennifer, Reschke Philipp, Vogl Thomas, Yel Ibrahim, Weimer Johannes, Wittek Agnes, Recker Florian. A Comparative Bicentric Study on Ultrasound Education for Students: App- and AI-Supported Learning Versus Traditional Hands-on Instruction (AI-Teach Study).. Academic radiology. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2025.04.024.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.