MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0212-6567(00)78655-0

Медицинская библиотека · Atencion primaria · 2000

[Sexual activity in cardiac patients. An empirical study].

Lameiras Fernández M, González Lorenzo M, Alvarez Diéguez S

Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study are to evaluate the beliefs and views linked to sexuality and sexual behaviour, and the emotional impact of a cardiac lesion.

DESIGN

A retrospective cross-sectional study of the lived experience of sexuality after the appearance of the cardiac lesion.

SETTING

Hospital and primary care.

PATIENTS AND OTHER

PARTICIPANTS

A sample of 30 people (12 women and 18 men) with a cardiac complaint, with an average age of 69.89 for women and 60.89 for men. 89% of the men had a stable partner (with an average age of 46.25), and 50% of the women (with an average age of 71.17).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS

Results showed that the appearance of disease was lived as a tough blow and imposed clear limitations on sufferers' lives. Specific sexual problems linked to cardiac complaints appeared, such as difficulties with erection (50%), reduction of libido (61.1%) and of intensity of pleasure (38.9%). Sexual activity was practically non-existent in the women surveyed.

CONCLUSIONS

The need to contribute a proper intervention for cardiovascular patients involves recognising the need to develop adequate programmes of sexual counselling. Health-workers must also give information on these kinds of question to cardiac patients.

Для цитирования: Lameiras Fernández M, González Lorenzo M, Alvarez Diéguez S. [Sexual activity in cardiac patients. An empirical study].. Atencion primaria. 2000. DOI: 10.1016/s0212-6567(00)78655-0.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.