Recognition and evaluation of red blood cell macrocytosis in the primary care setting.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To investigate primary care physicians' recognition and evaluation of red blood cell (RBC) macrocytosis in adults.
DESIGN
Retrospective chart review. Utilizing a computerized laboratory result system, all complete blood counts (CBCs) with RBC indices performed between May 1986 and May 1987 were retrieved. Patients having mean corpuscular volumes (MCVs) more than three standard deviations from the mean (greater than 98.5 fL) were selected for evaluation.
SETTING
The primary care clinics of a public university hospital.
PATIENTS: 138 (3.7%) of 3,805 adult outpatients had MCVs greater than 98.5 fL, and of these, 128 (93.4%) had medical charts available for review.
RESULTS
55 patients with elevated MCVs were not evaluated for this finding, and their mean MCV (100.6 fL) was significantly lower than that of the 73 patients who were evaluated (102.5 fL; p = 0.003). The investigation of macrocytosis included vitamin B12 and folate levels consistently, and the reticulocyte count and peripheral smear were examined infrequently. Five patients had vitamin B12 deficiency, and two had hypothyroidism. Macrocytosis was ascribed to alcohol abuse in 47 patients, six of whom had no laboratory evaluation. Nine alcoholic patients with macrocytosis had other causes for this finding. Among the 55 patients whose macrocytosis was not evaluated, 12 were anemic and one had a peripheral neuropathy.
CONCLUSIONS
Clinically significant and treatable disease was often associated with macrocytosis in our study. Macrocytosis was common, and its recognition and evaluation were variable in this primary care outpatient setting.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.