Hormones (Athens, Greece) · 2022
Adrenal findings in FDG-PET: analysis of a cohort of 1021 patients from a cancer center.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Maciel Joana, Cavaco Daniela, Fraga Davide, Donato Sara, Simões Helder, Sousa Rita, Simões-Pereira Joana
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The use of FDG-PET for cancer staging has led to the increasing incidence of adrenal lesions, which are usually a clinical challenge. We aimed to characterize the adrenal lesions found in FDG-PET of patients followed in a cancer center.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis was conducted of all FDG-PET studies performed in our center in the last 10 years. Exams reporting adrenal lesions in the CT component and/or anomalous adrenal FDG uptake were selected. Cases were characterized by the clinical, laboratory, imaging, and pathological findings.
RESULTS: We identified 27,427 FDG-PET studies. Of those, 7.6% reported adrenal findings. We included 1364 exams corresponding to 1021 patients. Only 15.6% of the patients were referred to the Endocrinology Department and 38% of the lesions were not studied. In 38.9% of the studied patients, malignant lesions were present, including metastases in 37.5%, carcinoma in 1.2%, and other malignant tumors in 0.4%. The median SUVmax of malignant lesions was significantly higher than the SUVmax of the benign findings (p < 0.05). We also observed a higher median SUVmax in adrenal metastases than in adenomas (p < 0.05). There was a tendency for higher SUVmax of adrenal carcinomas when compared with other malignant lesions (p = 0.066). The median SUVmax was not different between pheochromocytomas and other tumors (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Occult adrenal lesions discovered during FDG-PET/CT are common in the cancer context and are frequently benign. SUVmax may be a useful tool in the workup of adrenal lesions but with several important caveats.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis was conducted of all FDG-PET studies performed in our center in the last 10 years. Exams reporting adrenal lesions in the CT component and/or anomalous adrenal FDG uptake were selected. Cases were characterized by the clinical, laboratory, imaging, and pathological findings.
RESULTS: We identified 27,427 FDG-PET studies. Of those, 7.6% reported adrenal findings. We included 1364 exams corresponding to 1021 patients. Only 15.6% of the patients were referred to the Endocrinology Department and 38% of the lesions were not studied. In 38.9% of the studied patients, malignant lesions were present, including metastases in 37.5%, carcinoma in 1.2%, and other malignant tumors in 0.4%. The median SUVmax of malignant lesions was significantly higher than the SUVmax of the benign findings (p < 0.05). We also observed a higher median SUVmax in adrenal metastases than in adenomas (p < 0.05). There was a tendency for higher SUVmax of adrenal carcinomas when compared with other malignant lesions (p = 0.066). The median SUVmax was not different between pheochromocytomas and other tumors (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Occult adrenal lesions discovered during FDG-PET/CT are common in the cancer context and are frequently benign. SUVmax may be a useful tool in the workup of adrenal lesions but with several important caveats.