European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
[18F] MFBG PET imaging: biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, and comparison with [123I] MIBG in neural crest tumour patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pauwels Elin, Celen Sofie, Baete Kristof, Koole Michel, Bechter Oliver, Bex Marie, Renard Marleen, Clement Paul M, Jentjens Sander, Serdons Kim, Van Laere Koen, Bormans Guy, Deroose Christophe M
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Despite its limitations, [123I]MIBG scintigraphy has been the standard for human norepinephrine transporter (hNET) imaging for several decades. Recently, [18F]MFBG has emerged as a promising PET alternative. This prospective trial aimed to evaluate safety, biodistribution, tumour lesion pharmacokinetics, and lesion targeting of [18F]MFBG and perform a head-to-head comparison with [123I]MIBG in neural crest tumour patients.
METHODS: Six neural crest tumour patients (4 phaeochromocytoma, 1 paraganglioma, 1 neuroblastoma) with a recent routine clinical [123I]MIBG scintigraphy (interval: - 37-75 days) were included. Adult patients (n = 5) underwent a 30-min dynamic PET, followed by 3 whole-body PET/CT scans at 60, 120, and 180 min after injection of 4 MBq/kg [18F]MFBG. One minor participant underwent a single whole-body PET/CT at 60 min after administration of 2 MBq/kg [18F]MFBG. Normal organ uptake (SUVmean) and lesion uptake (SUVmax; tumour-to-background ratio (TBR)) were measured. Regional distribution volumes (VT) were estimated using a Logan graphical analysis in up to 6 lesions per patient. A lesion-by-lesion analysis was performed to compare detection ratios (DR), i.e. fraction of detected lesions, between [18F]MFBG and [123I]MIBG.
RESULTS: [18F]MFBG was safe and well tolerated. Its biodistribution was overall similar to that of [123I]MIBG, with prominent uptake in the salivary glands, liver, left ventricle wall and adrenals, and mainly urinary excretion. In the phaeochromocytoma subgroup, the median VT was 37.4 mL/cm3 (range: 18.0-144.8) with an excellent correlation between VT and SUVmean at all 3 time points (R2: 0.92-0.94). Mean lesion SUVmax and TBR at 1 h after injection were 19.3 ± 10.7 and 23.6 ± 8.4, respectively. All lesions detected with [123I]MIBG were also observed with [18F]MFBG. The mean DR with [123I]MIBG was significantly lower than with [18F]MFBG (61.0% ± 26.7% vs. 99.8% ± 0.5% at 1 h; p = 0.043).
CONCLUSION: [18F]MFBG is a promising hNET imaging agent with favourable imaging characteristics and improved lesion targeting compared with [123I]MIBG scintigraphy.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov : NCT04258592 (Registered: 06 February 2020), EudraCT: 2019-003872-37A.
METHODS: Six neural crest tumour patients (4 phaeochromocytoma, 1 paraganglioma, 1 neuroblastoma) with a recent routine clinical [123I]MIBG scintigraphy (interval: - 37-75 days) were included. Adult patients (n = 5) underwent a 30-min dynamic PET, followed by 3 whole-body PET/CT scans at 60, 120, and 180 min after injection of 4 MBq/kg [18F]MFBG. One minor participant underwent a single whole-body PET/CT at 60 min after administration of 2 MBq/kg [18F]MFBG. Normal organ uptake (SUVmean) and lesion uptake (SUVmax; tumour-to-background ratio (TBR)) were measured. Regional distribution volumes (VT) were estimated using a Logan graphical analysis in up to 6 lesions per patient. A lesion-by-lesion analysis was performed to compare detection ratios (DR), i.e. fraction of detected lesions, between [18F]MFBG and [123I]MIBG.
RESULTS: [18F]MFBG was safe and well tolerated. Its biodistribution was overall similar to that of [123I]MIBG, with prominent uptake in the salivary glands, liver, left ventricle wall and adrenals, and mainly urinary excretion. In the phaeochromocytoma subgroup, the median VT was 37.4 mL/cm3 (range: 18.0-144.8) with an excellent correlation between VT and SUVmean at all 3 time points (R2: 0.92-0.94). Mean lesion SUVmax and TBR at 1 h after injection were 19.3 ± 10.7 and 23.6 ± 8.4, respectively. All lesions detected with [123I]MIBG were also observed with [18F]MFBG. The mean DR with [123I]MIBG was significantly lower than with [18F]MFBG (61.0% ± 26.7% vs. 99.8% ± 0.5% at 1 h; p = 0.043).
CONCLUSION: [18F]MFBG is a promising hNET imaging agent with favourable imaging characteristics and improved lesion targeting compared with [123I]MIBG scintigraphy.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov : NCT04258592 (Registered: 06 February 2020), EudraCT: 2019-003872-37A.