Could Orthostatic Stress Responses Predict Acute Mountain Sickness Susceptibility Prior to High Altitude Travel? A Pilot Study.

Bellovary, Bryanne N., Andrew D. Wells, Zachary J. Fennel, Jeremy B. Ducharme, Jonathan M. Houck, Trevor J. Mayschak, Ann L. Gibson, Scott N. Drum, and Christine M. Mermier. Could orthostatic stress responses predict acute mountain sickness susceptibility before high altitude travel? A pilot study. High Alt Med Biol. 24:19-26, 2023. Purpose: This study assessed head-up tilt (HUT) responses in relation to acute mountain sickness (AMS)-susceptibility during hypoxic exposure. Materials and

Methods

Fifteen participants completed three lab visits: (1) protocol familiarization and cycle maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) test; (2) HUT test consisting of supine rest for 20 minutes followed by 70° tilting for ≤40 minutes; and (3) 6 hours of hypobaric hypoxic exposure (4,572 m) where participants performed two 30-minute cycling bouts separated by 1 hour at a 50% VO2max workload within the first 3 hours and rested when not exercising. During HUT, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure, heart rate (HR), and variability (blood pressure variability [BPV] and HR variability [HRV]) were measured continuously. The AMS scores were determined after 6 hours of exposure. Correlations determined relationships between HUT cardiovascular responses and AMS scores. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) assessed differences between those with and without AMS symptoms during HUT.

Results

Higher AMS scores correlated with greater change in SBP variability (r = 0.52, p = 0.048) and blunted changes in HRV (root mean square of successive differences between normal heartbeats r = 0.81, p = 0.001, percentage of adjacent normal sinus intervals that differ by more than 50 milliseconds [pNN50] r = 0.87, p < 0.001) during HUT. A pNN50 interaction (p = 0.02) suggested elevated cardiac sympathetic activity at baseline and a blunted increase in cardiac sympathetic influence throughout HUT in those with AMS (pNN50 baseline: AMS = 26.2% ± 15.3%, no AMS = 51.0% ± 13.5%; first 3 minutes into HUT: AMS = 17.2% ± 19.1%, no AMS = 17.1% ± 10.9%; end of HUT: AMS = 6.2% ± 9.1%, no AMS 11.0% ± 10.0%).

Conclusions

The results suggest autonomic responses via HUT differ in AMS-susceptible individuals. Changes in HRV and BPV during HUT may be a promising predictive measurement for AMS-susceptibility, but further research is needed for confirmation.