American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2026
Performance-based frailty tools capture distinct risk phenotypes in kidney transplant candidates: A comparative analysis of the FRAIL scale and short physical performance battery.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Verhoeff Rucháma, Hullekes Frank E, Jaffe Emily, Cataldo Jennie L, Rockenbach Marcio A B C, Bizzo Bernardo C, Pratt Hannah M, Foster Paul, Lee Sul A, Melaragno Nicolas, Warner Alexandria, Nissaisorakarn Pitchapon, Elias Nahel, Shah Shimul A, Gilligan Hannah M, de Bruin Ron W F, Porte Robert J, Riella Leonardo V
Аннотация
Frailty predicts adverse outcomes in kidney transplant candidates, but it remains unclear whether different frailty tools identify the same or distinct at-risk patients. In this retrospective cohort study, 953 kidney transplant candidates listed between 2018 and 2022 underwent frailty assessment using both the Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illnesses, Weight Loss (FRAIL) scale screening and the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) screening test. In a subset with available computed tomography scan imaging, body composition was analyzed using artificial intelligence-based tools. Frailty prevalence differed by instrument: 6.2% using the FRAIL scale screening vs 24% using the SPPB screening test. Waitlist mortality occurred in 9.5% (91/953) of candidates. Both tools independently predicted waitlist mortality (FRAIL scale screening test: adjusted hazard ratio, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.34-4.20; P = .003 and SPPB screening test: adjusted hazard ratio, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.07-2.60; P = .025). The SPPB screening test-defined frailty showed stronger associations with posttransplant outcomes, including longer hospital stays and 30-day and 1-year readmissions. A computed tomography scan analysis revealed that SPPB screening test-defined, but not FRAIL scale screening test-defined, frailty was associated with lower muscle density and increased visceral adiposity, suggesting a mechanistic basis. The FRAIL scale screening test and SPPB screening test captured distinct dimensions of frailty with complementary strengths. The FRAIL scale screening test better reflected symptom burden and candidates at risk for waitlist mortality, whereas the SPPB screening test was more closely associated with posttransplant complications. Results support systematic use of both instruments to optimize risk stratification and identify candidates who may benefit from targeted prehabilitation.