Journal of reconstructive microsurgery · 2022
Clinical Utility of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Parameters for Evaluating Patients with Lower Limb Lymphedema after Lymphovenous Anastomosis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Son Woo Chul, Kwon Jin Geun, Hong Joon Pio, Park Chang Sik, Kim Sang Ah, Do Jung Hwa, Cheon Hwayeong, Gelvosa Ma Nessa, Suh Hyun Suk, Jeon Jae Yong
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In lymphedema, lymphatic fluid accumulates in the interstitial space, and localized swelling appears. Lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) is the most widely used surgery to rebuild a damaged lymphatic system; however, assessing outcome of LVA involves performing volume measurements, which provides limited information on body composition changes. Therefore, we analyzed the bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) parameters that can reflect the status of lymphedema patients who underwent LVA.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records of 42 patients with unilateral lower extremity lymphedema who had LVA. We measured the perioperative BIA parameters such as extracellular water (ECW) ratio and volume as defined by the percentage of excess volume (PEV). We evaluated the relationship between the amount of change in PEV and in BIA parameters before and after surgery. We confirmed the correlation between ΔPEV and BIA parameters using Spearman's correlation.
RESULTS: Most patients included had secondary lymphedema due to cancer. Average age was 51.76 years and average body mass index was 23.27. PEV and all BIA parameters after surgery showed a significant difference (p < 0.01) compared with preoperative measurements. The ECW ratio aff/unaff showed the strongest correlation with PEV with a correlation coefficient of 0.473 (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that BIA parameters, especially ECW ratio aff/unaff could reflect the status of patients with lower limb lymphedema after LVA. Appropriate use of BIA parameters may be useful in the postoperative surveillance of patients.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records of 42 patients with unilateral lower extremity lymphedema who had LVA. We measured the perioperative BIA parameters such as extracellular water (ECW) ratio and volume as defined by the percentage of excess volume (PEV). We evaluated the relationship between the amount of change in PEV and in BIA parameters before and after surgery. We confirmed the correlation between ΔPEV and BIA parameters using Spearman's correlation.
RESULTS: Most patients included had secondary lymphedema due to cancer. Average age was 51.76 years and average body mass index was 23.27. PEV and all BIA parameters after surgery showed a significant difference (p < 0.01) compared with preoperative measurements. The ECW ratio aff/unaff showed the strongest correlation with PEV with a correlation coefficient of 0.473 (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that BIA parameters, especially ECW ratio aff/unaff could reflect the status of patients with lower limb lymphedema after LVA. Appropriate use of BIA parameters may be useful in the postoperative surveillance of patients.