Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2024
Quantifying Spatial Distribution of Ventilation Defects in Multiple Pulmonary Diseases With Hyperpolarized 129Xenon MRI.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bdaiwi Abdullah S, Willmering Matthew M, Woods Jason C, Walkup Laura L, Cleveland Zackary I
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Hyperpolarized 129Xe MRI assesses lung ventilation, often using the ventilation defect percentage (VDP). Unlike VDP, defect distribution index (DDI) quantifies spatial clustering of defects.
PURPOSE: To quantify spatial distribution of 129Xe ventilation defects using DDI across pulmonary diseases.
STUDY TYPE: Retrospective.
SUBJECTS: Four hundred twenty-one subjects (age = 23.1 ± 17.1, female = 230), comprising healthy controls (N = 60) and subjects with obstructive conditions (asthma [N = 25], bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome [BOS, N = 18], cystic fibrosis [CF, N = 90], lymphangioleiomyomatosis [LAM, N = 50]), restrictive conditions (bleomycin-treated cancer survivors [BLEO, N = 14]; fibrotic lung diseases [FLD, N = 92]), bone marrow transplantation (BMT, N = 53), and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD, N = 19).
FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3 T, two-dimensional multi-slice gradient echo.
ASSESSMENT: Whole-lung mean DDI was extracted from DDI maps; correlated with VDP (percent of pixels <60% of whole-lung mean signal intensity) and pulmonary function tests (PFTs) including FEV1, FVC, and FEV1/FVC. DDI and DDI/VDP, a marker of defect clustering, were compared across diseases.
STATISTICAL TESTS: Pearson correlation analysis and Kruskal-Wallis tests. P < 0.0056 for disease groups, P < 0.0125 for categories.
RESULTS: DDI was significantly elevated in BMT (8.3 ± 11.5), BOS (30.1 ± 57.5), BPD (16.0 ± 46.8), CF (15.4 ± 27.2), and LAM (12.6 ± 34.2) compared to controls (1.8 ± 3.1). DDI correlated significantly with VDP in all groups (r ≥ 0.56) except BLEO, and with PFTs in CF, FLD, and LAM (r ≥ 0.56). Obstructive groups had significantly higher mean DDI (14.0 ± 32.0) than controls (1.8 ± 3.0) and restrictive groups (4.0 ± 12.0). DDI/VDP was significantly lower in the restrictive group (0.6 ± 0.6) than controls (0.8 ± 0.6) and obstructive group (1.0 ± 1.0).
DATA CONCLUSION: DDI may provide insights into the distribution of ventilation defects across diseases.
EVIDENCE LEVEL: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
PURPOSE: To quantify spatial distribution of 129Xe ventilation defects using DDI across pulmonary diseases.
STUDY TYPE: Retrospective.
SUBJECTS: Four hundred twenty-one subjects (age = 23.1 ± 17.1, female = 230), comprising healthy controls (N = 60) and subjects with obstructive conditions (asthma [N = 25], bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome [BOS, N = 18], cystic fibrosis [CF, N = 90], lymphangioleiomyomatosis [LAM, N = 50]), restrictive conditions (bleomycin-treated cancer survivors [BLEO, N = 14]; fibrotic lung diseases [FLD, N = 92]), bone marrow transplantation (BMT, N = 53), and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD, N = 19).
FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3 T, two-dimensional multi-slice gradient echo.
ASSESSMENT: Whole-lung mean DDI was extracted from DDI maps; correlated with VDP (percent of pixels <60% of whole-lung mean signal intensity) and pulmonary function tests (PFTs) including FEV1, FVC, and FEV1/FVC. DDI and DDI/VDP, a marker of defect clustering, were compared across diseases.
STATISTICAL TESTS: Pearson correlation analysis and Kruskal-Wallis tests. P < 0.0056 for disease groups, P < 0.0125 for categories.
RESULTS: DDI was significantly elevated in BMT (8.3 ± 11.5), BOS (30.1 ± 57.5), BPD (16.0 ± 46.8), CF (15.4 ± 27.2), and LAM (12.6 ± 34.2) compared to controls (1.8 ± 3.1). DDI correlated significantly with VDP in all groups (r ≥ 0.56) except BLEO, and with PFTs in CF, FLD, and LAM (r ≥ 0.56). Obstructive groups had significantly higher mean DDI (14.0 ± 32.0) than controls (1.8 ± 3.0) and restrictive groups (4.0 ± 12.0). DDI/VDP was significantly lower in the restrictive group (0.6 ± 0.6) than controls (0.8 ± 0.6) and obstructive group (1.0 ± 1.0).
DATA CONCLUSION: DDI may provide insights into the distribution of ventilation defects across diseases.
EVIDENCE LEVEL: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.