bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
Genomic analysis of BCG unresponsive non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer identifies drivers of sensitivity to intravesical Gemcitabine/Docetaxel.
СтатьяПрепринтНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yim Kendrick, Vergara Matias, Lee Jihyun, Reardon Brendan, Park Jihye, Melnick Kevin, Clinton Timothy N, Mossanen Matthew, Steele Graeme S, Bolduc Jessica, Hirsch Michelle, Rizzo Natalie, Wu Chin-Lee, Wszolek Matthew, Salari Keyan, Feldman Adam, Kibel Adam S, Mouw Kent W, Van Allen Eliezer, Preston Mark A, Carvalho Filipe Lf
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Intravesical gemcitabine/docetaxel (Gem/Doce) is an effective therapy for Bacillus Calmette- Guérin (BCG)-unresponsive non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), achieving 50% complete responses at 2 years. However, the genomic determinants underlying response and resistance to Gem/Doce remain poorly defined. Our objective was to define the mutational landscape of BCG-unresponsive NMIBC and nominate genomic features associated with response or resistance Gem/Doce.
METHODS: Patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC treated with Gem/Doce were classified as responders (recurrence-free survival [RFS] >12 months) or non-responders (RFS <12 months). Whole-exome sequencing was performed on tumors prior to Gem/Doce treatment (n=23). Single nucleotide variants were identified and annotated using a Cancer Genome Analysis pipeline. Copy number alterations were inferred with ABSOLUTE, and clonal architecture was reconstructed using PhylogicNDT.
KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Responders demonstrated significantly prolonged time to high-grade recurrence (3.5 vs 42 months, p<0.001) and cystectomy compared with non-responders (9.5 months vs not reached; p<0.001). Non-responders exhibited higher tumor mutational burden (13.66 vs 8.71; p=0.02) and more frequent whole-genome doubling (2/2 non-responders vs 0/1 responders; p=0.33). Phylogenetic analyses revealed clonal BAP1 and subclonal BRCA2 mutations in responders, whereas non-responders harbored clonal FGFR3 mutations. Limitations include small sample size and retrospective design.
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Distinct genomic features underlie differential response to Gem/Doce in BCG-unresponsive NMIBC. In responders, alterations in DNA repair pathways (e.g., BRCA2 ) may sensitize tumors to chemotherapy, while non-responders with FGFR3 mutations may benefit from alternative targeted strategies. These findings warrant validation in larger cohorts and support the development of biomarker-driven clinical trials.
PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report we analyzed bladder tumors and found that some tumors respond well to treatment because they have defects in repairing DNA, making them more vulnerable to chemotherapy. In contrast, tumors that do not respond to chemotherapy harbor different genetic changes that help them survive and grow. These findings may help physicians choose more effective and personalized treatments in the future.
METHODS: Patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC treated with Gem/Doce were classified as responders (recurrence-free survival [RFS] >12 months) or non-responders (RFS <12 months). Whole-exome sequencing was performed on tumors prior to Gem/Doce treatment (n=23). Single nucleotide variants were identified and annotated using a Cancer Genome Analysis pipeline. Copy number alterations were inferred with ABSOLUTE, and clonal architecture was reconstructed using PhylogicNDT.
KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Responders demonstrated significantly prolonged time to high-grade recurrence (3.5 vs 42 months, p<0.001) and cystectomy compared with non-responders (9.5 months vs not reached; p<0.001). Non-responders exhibited higher tumor mutational burden (13.66 vs 8.71; p=0.02) and more frequent whole-genome doubling (2/2 non-responders vs 0/1 responders; p=0.33). Phylogenetic analyses revealed clonal BAP1 and subclonal BRCA2 mutations in responders, whereas non-responders harbored clonal FGFR3 mutations. Limitations include small sample size and retrospective design.
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Distinct genomic features underlie differential response to Gem/Doce in BCG-unresponsive NMIBC. In responders, alterations in DNA repair pathways (e.g., BRCA2 ) may sensitize tumors to chemotherapy, while non-responders with FGFR3 mutations may benefit from alternative targeted strategies. These findings warrant validation in larger cohorts and support the development of biomarker-driven clinical trials.
PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report we analyzed bladder tumors and found that some tumors respond well to treatment because they have defects in repairing DNA, making them more vulnerable to chemotherapy. In contrast, tumors that do not respond to chemotherapy harbor different genetic changes that help them survive and grow. These findings may help physicians choose more effective and personalized treatments in the future.