MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1055/s-0040-1722692

Медицинская библиотека · The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon · 2021

Comparison of Self-Expanding RDV Perceval S versus TAVI ACURATE neo/TF.

Gerfer Stephen, Mauri Victor, Kuhn Elmar, Adam Matti, Eghbalzadeh Kaveh, Djordjevic Ilija, Ivanov Borko, Gaisendrees Christopher, Frerker Christian, Schmidt Tobias, Mader Navid, Rudolph Tanja, Baldus Stephan, Liakopoulos Oliver, Wahlers Thorsten

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Rapid deployment aortic valve replacement (RDAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have emerged as increasingly used alternatives to conventional aortic valve replacement to treat patients at higher surgical risk. Therefore, in this single-center study, we retrospectively compared clinical outcomes and hemodynamic performance of two self-expanding biological prostheses, the sutureless and rapid deployment valve (RDV) Perceval-S (PER) and the transcatheter heart valve (THV) ACURATE neo/TF (NEO) in a 1:1 propensity-score-matching (PSM) patient cohort.

METHODS

A total of 332 consecutive patients with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis underwent either singular RDAVR with PER (119) or TAVI with NEO (213) at our institutions between 2012 and 2017. To compare the unequal patient groups, a 1:1 PSM for preoperative data and comorbidities was conducted. Afterward, 59 patient pairs were compared with regard to relevant hemodynamic parameter, relevant paravalvular leak (PVL), permanent postoperative pacemaker (PPM) implantation rate, and clinical postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Postoperative clinical short-term outcomes presented with slightly higher rates for 30-day all-cause mortality (PER = 5.1% vs. NEO = 1.7%, p = 0.619) and major adverse cardiocerebral event in PER due to cerebrovascular events (transient ischemic attack [TIA]-PER = 3.4% vs. TIA-NEO = 1.7%, p = 0.496 and Stroke-PER = 1.7% vs. Stroke-NEO = 0.0%, p = 1). Moreover, we show comparable PPM rates (PER = 10.2% vs. NEO = 8.5%, p = 0.752). However, higher numbers of PVL (mild-PER = 0.0% vs. NEO = 55.9%, p = 0.001; moderate or higher-PER = 0.0% vs. NEO = 6.8%, p = 0.119) after TAVI with NEO were observed.

CONCLUSION

Both self-expanding bioprostheses, the RDV-PER and THV-NEO provide a feasible option in elderly and patients with elevated perioperative risk. However, the discussed PER collective showed more postoperative short-term complications with regard to 30-day all-cause mortality and cerebrovascular events, whereas the NEO showed higher rates of PVL.

Для цитирования: Gerfer Stephen, Mauri Victor, Kuhn Elmar, Adam Matti, Eghbalzadeh Kaveh, Djordjevic Ilija, Ivanov Borko, Gaisendrees Christopher, Frerker Christian, Schmidt Tobias, Mader Navid, Rudolph Tanja, Baldus Stephan, Liakopoulos Oliver, Wahlers Thorsten. Comparison of Self-Expanding RDV Perceval S versus TAVI ACURATE neo/TF.. The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon. 2021. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1722692.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.