m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2004

Is the endovascular treatment of carotid stenosis in high-risk patients really safer than carotid endarterectomy?

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

McKevitt F M, Macdonald S, Venables G S, Cleveland T J, Gaines P A

Аннотация

BACKGROUND: We assess the outcomes of patients who would have been considered at high-risk from carotid endarterectomy (CEA), who have undergone endovascular treatment.

METHODS: High-risk patients were classed as those with occlusion of the contralateral internal carotid artery, recurrent stenosis following CEA, stenosis secondary to neck irradiation or treatment prior to coronary bypass surgery.

RESULTS: 103 procedures fulfilled at least one inclusion criterion. 58.3% had symptomatic disease. The all stroke/death rate was 9.7%. The major disabling stroke/stroke-related death rate was 3.9%. 63 had a contralateral occlusion, 15 post-CEA, 17 post-radiation and 33 pre-coronary surgery. The major disabling stroke/stroke-related death rates for each subset were 4.8, 6.7, 0 and 0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that this category of patients is at high-risk of stroke regardless of method of carotid intervention.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты