Journal of vascular surgery · 2003
Carotid bypass with polytetrafluoroethylene grafts: a study of 110 consecutive patients.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Camiade Christophe, Maher Amer, Ricco Jean-Baptiste, Roumy Jérôme, Febrer Guillaume, Marchand Christophe, Neau Jean-Philippe
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the standard treatment for atherosclerotic lesions involving the carotid bifurcation. However, CEA can be challenging under some conditions. We describe the technique and outcome of prosthetic carotid bypass grafting (PCB) with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts as an elective alternative to CEA.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data came from a series of 110 consecutive PCBs, that is, 9.6% of 1140 carotid revascularization procedures performed in our department between September 1986 and July 2002. Primary indications for PCB were extensive atherosclerotic lesions (n = 45, 40.9%), carotid stenosis associated with kinking (n = 29, 26.4%), recurrent stenosis (n = 18, 16.4%), and stenosis after radiation therapy (n = 7, 6.4%).
RESULTS: The combined stroke and death rate at 30 days was 0.9%. Mean duration of follow-up was 647 +/- 71 days. Four carotid bypass grafts (3.6%) became occluded, and stenosis recurred in 1 (0.9%). At 3 years, overall actuarial survival was 81.4 +/- 11.5 and actuarial stroke-free rate was 97.7 +/- 2.3. There were no fatal strokes.
CONCLUSION: PCB is a viable technique for treatment of extensive atherosclerotic carotid lesions, recurrent carotid stenosis, and carotid stenosis after radiation therapy. Postoperative stroke, occlusion, and recurrent stenosis rates are comparable to those associated with CEA performed under optimal conditions.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data came from a series of 110 consecutive PCBs, that is, 9.6% of 1140 carotid revascularization procedures performed in our department between September 1986 and July 2002. Primary indications for PCB were extensive atherosclerotic lesions (n = 45, 40.9%), carotid stenosis associated with kinking (n = 29, 26.4%), recurrent stenosis (n = 18, 16.4%), and stenosis after radiation therapy (n = 7, 6.4%).
RESULTS: The combined stroke and death rate at 30 days was 0.9%. Mean duration of follow-up was 647 +/- 71 days. Four carotid bypass grafts (3.6%) became occluded, and stenosis recurred in 1 (0.9%). At 3 years, overall actuarial survival was 81.4 +/- 11.5 and actuarial stroke-free rate was 97.7 +/- 2.3. There were no fatal strokes.
CONCLUSION: PCB is a viable technique for treatment of extensive atherosclerotic carotid lesions, recurrent carotid stenosis, and carotid stenosis after radiation therapy. Postoperative stroke, occlusion, and recurrent stenosis rates are comparable to those associated with CEA performed under optimal conditions.