Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
Comparison of the Efficacy of Different Insulin Administration and Blood Glucose Monitoring Methods in the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in Children.
Источник пометил эту публикацию как отозванную.
СтатьяОтозванная публикацияНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Deng Qian, Chen Yuqing, Wang Xin, Cai Wenjuan, Han Yanping, Wang Juanjuan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy of different insulin administration methods and blood glucose monitoring methods in treating type 1 diabetes mellitus in children.
METHODS: Patients were divided into four groups: multiple daily injection (MDI) + fingertip blood glucose detection, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) + fingertip blood glucose detection, MDI + continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS), and CSII + CGMS. After six months of treatment, followed by telephone and at least once a month in an outpatient clinic, insulin doses were adjusted according to the children's blood glucose levels. Blood glucose control and the daily dose of insulin were compared among the four groups after treatment, and the incidence of hypoglycemia in each group was recorded during the treatment. We also compare the incidence of the adverse event among the four groups.
RESULTS: 6 months later, the levels of HbA1c, FBG, and two h PG in each group were lower than those before treatment. There were significant differences in HbA1c, two h PG, and the daily insulin dose among the four groups. There were differences in the frequency of hypoglycemia among all the groups. The frequency of hypoglycemia in groups C and D was lower than in group A.
CONCLUSIONS: CSII was better than MDI, and the blood glucose monitoring effect of CGMS was better than the fingertip blood glucose detection. The patients treated with CSII combined with CGMS had the best clinical efficacy. The patients treated with CSII combined with CGMS had the lowest adverse events incidence.
METHODS: Patients were divided into four groups: multiple daily injection (MDI) + fingertip blood glucose detection, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) + fingertip blood glucose detection, MDI + continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS), and CSII + CGMS. After six months of treatment, followed by telephone and at least once a month in an outpatient clinic, insulin doses were adjusted according to the children's blood glucose levels. Blood glucose control and the daily dose of insulin were compared among the four groups after treatment, and the incidence of hypoglycemia in each group was recorded during the treatment. We also compare the incidence of the adverse event among the four groups.
RESULTS: 6 months later, the levels of HbA1c, FBG, and two h PG in each group were lower than those before treatment. There were significant differences in HbA1c, two h PG, and the daily insulin dose among the four groups. There were differences in the frequency of hypoglycemia among all the groups. The frequency of hypoglycemia in groups C and D was lower than in group A.
CONCLUSIONS: CSII was better than MDI, and the blood glucose monitoring effect of CGMS was better than the fingertip blood glucose detection. The patients treated with CSII combined with CGMS had the best clinical efficacy. The patients treated with CSII combined with CGMS had the lowest adverse events incidence.