MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/archsurg.143.5.457

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960) · 2008

Angiographic embolization for gastroduodenal hemorrhage: safety, efficacy, and predictors of outcome.

Poultsides George A, Kim Christine J, Orlando Rocco, Peros George, Hallisey Michael J, Vignati Paul V

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To examine the safety, efficacy, and predictors of outcome of angiographic embolization in the management of gastroduodenal hemorrhage.

DESIGN

Retrospective record review.

SETTING

University-affiliated tertiary care center.

PATIENTS: All of the patients were referred after endoscopic treatment failure. Surgery was not immediately considered because of poor surgical risk, refusal to consent, or endoscopist's decision. Patients with coagulopathy, hemobilia, and variceal or traumatic upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding were excluded from review.

INTERVENTIONS: Between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2006, 70 embolization procedures were performed in 57 patients.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Technical success rate (target vessel devascularization), clinical success rate (in-hospital cessation of bleeding without further endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical intervention), and complications.

RESULTS

The technical success rate was 94% (66 of 70 angiographies). The primary clinical success rate was 51% (29 of 57 patients), and the clinical success rate after repeat embolization was 56% (32 of 57 patients). Two factors were found to be independent predictors of poor outcome by multivariate analysis: recent duodenal ulcer suture ligation (P = .03) and blood transfusion of more than 6 units prior to the procedure (P = .04). There was no predictive value for angiographic failure based on age, sex, prior coagulopathy, renal failure at presentation, immunocompromised status, multiple organ system failure, empirical (blind) embolization, and use of permanent vs temporary embolic agents. Repeat embolizations were helpful for postsphincterotomy bleeding. Major ischemic complications (4 patients [7%]) were associated with previous foregut surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Angiographic embolization for gastroduodenal hemorrhage was associated with in-hospital rebleeding in almost half of the patients. Angiographic failure can be predicted if embolization is performed late, following blood transfusion of more than 6 units, or for rehemorrhage from a previously suture-ligated duodenal ulcer.

Для цитирования: Poultsides George A, Kim Christine J, Orlando Rocco, Peros George, Hallisey Michael J, Vignati Paul V. Angiographic embolization for gastroduodenal hemorrhage: safety, efficacy, and predictors of outcome.. Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960). 2008. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.143.5.457.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.