La Tunisie medicale · 2008
[Feasibility of laparoscopic treatment of duodenal ulcers: results of 160 cases].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Khelifi Slim, Ben Ali Ali, Bouhafa Ahmed, Zghidi Souheil, Ben Maamer Anis, Jaoua Hazem, Oueslati Abdelaziz, Ouertani Fethi, Cherif Abderraouf
Аннотация
AIM: The objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and safety of laparoscopic repair for perforated duodenal ulcer.
METHODS: One hundred and sixty patients were treated by coelioscopic procedure for a perforated duodenal ulcer. The procedure consists on a suture of perforated ulcer associated with a peritoneal lavage. A medical treatment of Helicobacter pylori associated with an inhibitor of the protons pomp was conducted.
RESULTS: The coelioscopic procedure permitted to confirm the diagnostic of perforated duodenal ulcer in all cases. A simple suture of the ulcer was done in 155 cases. The conversion was compulsory in 5 cases, because of difficulties of the peritoneal lavage in 2 cases, a bleeding associated with perforation of the ulcer in one case and associated stenosis in 2 cases. Mean duration was 90 min (extremes 50 - 120 min). Complications occur in 3,1%. They were post - operative peritonitis in 3 cases and duodenal fistulae in 2 cases. All patients were reviewed at 16 months. A recurrence, either clinical or endoscopic occurs in 4 cases because of no adhesion to medical treatment.
CONCLUSION: Coelioscopic treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer is a safe and efficacy method. It permits to avoid potential septic and parietal complications of laparotomy. The actual efficacy of medical treatment mustn't allow place to the radical treatment of ulcerous illness.
METHODS: One hundred and sixty patients were treated by coelioscopic procedure for a perforated duodenal ulcer. The procedure consists on a suture of perforated ulcer associated with a peritoneal lavage. A medical treatment of Helicobacter pylori associated with an inhibitor of the protons pomp was conducted.
RESULTS: The coelioscopic procedure permitted to confirm the diagnostic of perforated duodenal ulcer in all cases. A simple suture of the ulcer was done in 155 cases. The conversion was compulsory in 5 cases, because of difficulties of the peritoneal lavage in 2 cases, a bleeding associated with perforation of the ulcer in one case and associated stenosis in 2 cases. Mean duration was 90 min (extremes 50 - 120 min). Complications occur in 3,1%. They were post - operative peritonitis in 3 cases and duodenal fistulae in 2 cases. All patients were reviewed at 16 months. A recurrence, either clinical or endoscopic occurs in 4 cases because of no adhesion to medical treatment.
CONCLUSION: Coelioscopic treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer is a safe and efficacy method. It permits to avoid potential septic and parietal complications of laparotomy. The actual efficacy of medical treatment mustn't allow place to the radical treatment of ulcerous illness.