Diagnostic Performance of European and American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System Classification Systems in Thyroid Nodules Over 20 mm in Diameter.

OBJECTIVE

The challenge of selecting thyroid nodules for fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology has led to the development of the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System, primarily in 2 formats: European Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (EU-TIRADS) and American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR-TIRADS). Clinical observations suggest imperfect risk assessment for TIRADS 3 nodules ≥20 mm. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of TIRADS systems in distinguishing benign from malignant nodules in this subgroup.

METHODS

From May 2023 to March 2024, 1094 patients with thyroid nodules were referred for ultrasound at a University Hospital. Data on clinical, ultrasound, cytological, and histopathological parameters were collected. Nodules ≥20 mm were categorized by EU-TIRADS and ACR-TIRADS, and their predictive performance for malignancy was assessed through postthyroidectomy histopathology or FNA cytology (Bethesda classification).

RESULTS

Two hundred sixty-seven patients (mean age 60.3 ± 14.3 years; 46 men, 221 women) with 308 nodules were analyzed. Twenty-two malignancies and 286 benign nodules were recorded. Recalculating European Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 performance using 25-mm and 30-mm thresholds (ACR-modified EU-TIRADS) avoided 24% and 41% of FNAs, respectively, while ACR-TIRADS would prevent 26.6% (P > .05). Two malignancies were missed.

CONCLUSION

EU-TIRADS and ACR-TIRADS show similar efficacy when using a 25 mm FNA threshold. Raising the cutoff for FNA in European Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 nodules could reduce unnecessary procedures but may increase the risk of missed malignancies, impacting patient outcomes.