MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08087.x

Медицинская библиотека · The British journal of dermatology · 2007

Community-based study of acne vulgaris in adolescents in Singapore.

Tan H-H, Tan A W H, Barkham T, Yan X-Y, Zhu M

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

There are few studies on the prevalence of acne vulgaris among Asian teenagers.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the epidemiology of acne in teenagers in Singapore.

METHODS

A community-based cross-sectional study in 1045 adolescents aged 13-19 years.

RESULTS

Of these respondents, 88% identified themselves as having acne. Eight hundred and six of these respondents were examined by a dermatologist, and 51.4% were classified as having mild acne, 40% moderate acne and 8.6% severe acne. Isolation of Propionibacterium acnes was attempted in 262 subjects. Cultures were positive in 174 subjects, giving an isolation rate of 66.4%. Antibiotic-resistant strains of P. acnes were detected in 26 isolates (14.9%). Eleven of these 26 subjects (42%) had previously been treated or were presently on antibiotic treatment for acne, but the other 58% of students who had antibiotic-resistant strains of P. acnes did not give a history of prior antibiotic therapy. Teenagers expressed psychological distress over acne, and believed that hormonal factors, diet and hygiene were important factors in causing acne.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need for accessible, accurate education on acne and its appropriate treatment.

Для цитирования: Tan H-H, Tan A W H, Barkham T, Yan X-Y, Zhu M. Community-based study of acne vulgaris in adolescents in Singapore.. The British journal of dermatology. 2007. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08087.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.