Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.] · 2007
Comparison of stacked pulses versus double-pass treatments of facial acne with a 1,450-nm laser.
Контролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Uebelhoer Nathan S, Bogle Melissa A, Dover Jeffrey S, Arndt Kenneth A, Rohrer Thomas E
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Although effective as a monotherapy for the treatment of inflammatory acne, the 1,450-nm diode laser is associated with considerable pain at higher fluences.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven subjects were treated with a 1,450-nm diode laser in a split-face bilateral paired acne study. One-half of the face received a single-pass consisting of stacked double pulses. The other side received a double-pass treatment of single pulses. Settings were 11 J/cm(2) or lower as tolerated with appropriate dynamic cooling device (range 25-35).
RESULTS: The mean pain rating was 5.33 on a 0 to 10 scale on the stacked-pulse treatment side and 5.12 on the double-pass side. Blinded reduction in mean acne lesion counts were 57.6% and 49.8% reduction, respectively. An overall acne scar improvement was seen in 83% of subjects with acne scarring. Transient hyperpigmentation occurred in two patients on the stacked pulse side and completely resolved without sequelae.
CONCLUSIONS: The pulsed 1,450-nm diode laser can be used at lower fluences that elicit less discomfort yet effectively improve inflammatory acne. Stacking pulses appears to render a slightly higher efficacy than the multipass technique. Single-pulse, multiple-pass treatments may have a lower risk of cryogen-induced transient hyperpigmentation compared to standard high fluence techniques.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven subjects were treated with a 1,450-nm diode laser in a split-face bilateral paired acne study. One-half of the face received a single-pass consisting of stacked double pulses. The other side received a double-pass treatment of single pulses. Settings were 11 J/cm(2) or lower as tolerated with appropriate dynamic cooling device (range 25-35).
RESULTS: The mean pain rating was 5.33 on a 0 to 10 scale on the stacked-pulse treatment side and 5.12 on the double-pass side. Blinded reduction in mean acne lesion counts were 57.6% and 49.8% reduction, respectively. An overall acne scar improvement was seen in 83% of subjects with acne scarring. Transient hyperpigmentation occurred in two patients on the stacked pulse side and completely resolved without sequelae.
CONCLUSIONS: The pulsed 1,450-nm diode laser can be used at lower fluences that elicit less discomfort yet effectively improve inflammatory acne. Stacking pulses appears to render a slightly higher efficacy than the multipass technique. Single-pulse, multiple-pass treatments may have a lower risk of cryogen-induced transient hyperpigmentation compared to standard high fluence techniques.