Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A · 2009
Minimally invasive surgery for anorectal malformation in boys: a multicenter study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Podevin Guillaume, Petit Thierry, Mure Pierre Yves, Gelas Thomas, Demarche Martine, Allal Hossein, Becmeur François, Varlet François, Philippe Paul, Weil Dominique, Heloury Yves
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The laparoscopic pull-through for high imperforate anus in boys has recently been developed in France and Benelux. The purpose of this study was to evaluate technical difficulties and surgical complications of this approach.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: This report was based on a retrospective study from January 2002 to December 2007,including 34 patients from 10 centers. The rectourinary fistula found in 33/34 cases was bulbar in 10, prostaticin 20, and cervical in 3.
RESULTS: Patients were 3.7 months old (range, 1.6-10.4) at surgery. Fistula was cut without closure in 11 cases or divided and closed on the genitourinary side with a suture in 15, with clips in five and linear stapler in two.Median operative duration was 152 mm (range, 80-410). The main per-operative complication, occurring in five cases, was leakage of stools from the rectum after the fistula section, requiring in one case a second laparoscopic procedure for washing and for all five cases intravenous antibiotics. Median hospital stay was 6 days(range, 3-15). During the follow-up, patients experienced eight anal stenoses and three prolapses, requiring in three cases perineal redo surgery.
CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic approach of high imperforate anus allowed an easy control of the fistula and helped to determine the accurate passage through the levator ani. Nevertheless, technical points have to be improved,such as coprostasis before fistula section to avoid stool leakage, rectum tacking to prevent prolapse,and calibration of muscle channel to avoid stenosis.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: This report was based on a retrospective study from January 2002 to December 2007,including 34 patients from 10 centers. The rectourinary fistula found in 33/34 cases was bulbar in 10, prostaticin 20, and cervical in 3.
RESULTS: Patients were 3.7 months old (range, 1.6-10.4) at surgery. Fistula was cut without closure in 11 cases or divided and closed on the genitourinary side with a suture in 15, with clips in five and linear stapler in two.Median operative duration was 152 mm (range, 80-410). The main per-operative complication, occurring in five cases, was leakage of stools from the rectum after the fistula section, requiring in one case a second laparoscopic procedure for washing and for all five cases intravenous antibiotics. Median hospital stay was 6 days(range, 3-15). During the follow-up, patients experienced eight anal stenoses and three prolapses, requiring in three cases perineal redo surgery.
CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic approach of high imperforate anus allowed an easy control of the fistula and helped to determine the accurate passage through the levator ani. Nevertheless, technical points have to be improved,such as coprostasis before fistula section to avoid stool leakage, rectum tacking to prevent prolapse,and calibration of muscle channel to avoid stenosis.