MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1601-0825.1998.tb00253.x

Медицинская библиотека · Oral diseases · 1998

Prevalence of oral lichen planus in diabetes mellitus according to the type of diabetes.

Petrou-Amerikanou C, Markopoulos A K, Belazi M, Karamitsos D, Papanayotou P

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the present study was to determine the prevalence of oral lichen planus (OLP) in a population of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) as compared with a control population.

DESIGN

A clinicopathologic study.

SUBJECTS AND

METHODS

One hundred and thirty-nine patients with type I DM, 353 patients with type II DM and 274 controls were examined for clinical evidence of OLP. The clinical evidence of OLP in the diabetic and control patients was confirmed by histopathological examination.

RESULTS

The prevalence of OLP in type I diabetic patients was 5.76%, in type II 2.83%, and 1.82% in the controls. The prevalence of OLP was significantly higher in patients with type I DM and slightly higher in patients with type II DM in comparison to the prevalence in the control sample.

CONCLUSIONS

The above findings and the fact that type I diabetes and OLP are characterized by autoimmune phenomena and T cell immune responses respectively, suggest that the immune system may play a critical role in the appearance of OLP in patients with type I DM.

Для цитирования: Petrou-Amerikanou C, Markopoulos A K, Belazi M, Karamitsos D, Papanayotou P. Prevalence of oral lichen planus in diabetes mellitus according to the type of diabetes.. Oral diseases. 1998. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.1998.tb00253.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.