Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society · 2005
Comparison of 2 mapping strategies for pulmonary vein isolation.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kumagai Koichiro, Ogawa Masahiro, Noguchi Hiroo, Nakashima Hideko, Zhang Bo, Miura Shin-ichiro, Saku Keijiro
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation using a circular catheter (CC) creates an entrance block from the left atrium (LA) to PV to eliminate paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). We describe a new approach for PV isolation during distal PV pacing using a basket catheter (BC). The purpose of the present study was to compare 2 mapping strategies for PV isolation.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 100 consecutive patients with PAF, 50 underwent CC-guided PV isolation and 50 underwent BC-guided PV isolation. During CC-guided ablation, the endpoint was the elimination of PV potentials based on the entrance block from the LA to PV. During BC-guided ablation during distal PV pacing, the endpoint was the elimination of bidirectional PV-LA conduction. At 12 months, 62% of patients who underwent CC ablation and 80% of patients who underwent BC ablation were free of symptomatic PAF without the use of antiarrhythmic drugs (p<0.05). The incidence of mild (<50%) PV stenosis in BC ablation was significantly lower than that in CC ablation (12 vs 24%, p<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: This new approach for PV isolation during distal PV pacing using BC is useful for confirming a bidirectional PV-LA conduction block and is more effective than CC ablation.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 100 consecutive patients with PAF, 50 underwent CC-guided PV isolation and 50 underwent BC-guided PV isolation. During CC-guided ablation, the endpoint was the elimination of PV potentials based on the entrance block from the LA to PV. During BC-guided ablation during distal PV pacing, the endpoint was the elimination of bidirectional PV-LA conduction. At 12 months, 62% of patients who underwent CC ablation and 80% of patients who underwent BC ablation were free of symptomatic PAF without the use of antiarrhythmic drugs (p<0.05). The incidence of mild (<50%) PV stenosis in BC ablation was significantly lower than that in CC ablation (12 vs 24%, p<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: This new approach for PV isolation during distal PV pacing using BC is useful for confirming a bidirectional PV-LA conduction block and is more effective than CC ablation.