Computers in biology and medicine · 2021
Multi-model and multi-slice ensemble learning architecture based on 2D convolutional neural networks for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kang Wenjie, Lin Lan, Zhang Baiwen, Shen Xiaoqi, Wu Shuicai, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
Аннотация
Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is a chronic neurodegenerative disease without effective medications or supplemental treatments. Thus, predicting AD progression is crucial for clinical practice and medical research. Due to limited neuroimaging data, two-dimensional convolutional neural networks (2D CNNs) have been commonly adopted to differentiate among cognitively normal subjects (CN), people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and AD patients. Therefore, this paper proposes an ensemble learning (EL) architecture based on 2D CNNs, using a multi-model and multi-slice ensemble. First, the top 11 coronal slices of grey matter density maps for AD versus CN classifications were selected. Second, the discriminator of a generative adversarial network, VGG16, and ResNet50 were trained with the selected slices, and the majority voting scheme was used to merge the multi-slice decisions of each model. Afterwards, those three classifiers were used to construct an ensemble model. Multi-slice ensemble learning was designed to obtain spatial features, while multi-model integration reduced the prediction error rate. Finally, transfer learning was used in domain adaptation to refine those CNNs, moving them from working solely with AD versus CN classifications to being applicable to other tasks. This ensemble approach achieved accuracy values of 90.36%, 77.19%, and 72.36% when classifying AD versus CN, AD versus MCI, and MCI versus CN, respectively. Compared with other state-of-the-art 2D studies, the proposed approach provides an effective, accurate, automatic diagnosis along the AD continuum. This technique may enhance AD diagnostics when the sample size is limited.