MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fonc.2026.1935585

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in oncology · 2026

Leptomeningeal metastasis from colon cancer: a case report and review of literature.

Wang Chao, Wu Daixi, Wang Aolin, Zhang Xiaojia, Duan Jianghui, Dong Mingrui, Li Mingxiao, Qi Zhirong, Cui Huijuan

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Leptomeningeal metastasis from colorectal cancer (LM-CRC) is a rare condition characterized by poor outcomes and no established standard of care.

CASE DESCRIPTION: We report a 60-year-old female patient who presented with constipation and abdominal pain. Eight months prior, she had been diagnosed with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the sigmoid colon with focal signet-ring cell features, proficient mismatch repair, and a KRAS mutation. She had received treatment with FOLFOX/FOLFIRI ± bevacizumab. Five days before admission, she developed headache and vomiting. Contrast-enhanced brain MRI suggested leptomeningeal metastasis, which was confirmed by lumbar puncture cytology. Owing to progressive symptom deterioration, the patient did not receive any antitumor therapy timely and died two weeks after symptom onset. In this review, we summarize 29 cases of LM-CRC, aiming to characterize the pathology, symptoms, diagnosis, and survival data of LM-CRC in order to enhance clinicians' awareness of this rare disease.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of LM-CRC is low and the prognosis is extremely poor; active anti-tumor therapy may prolong patient survival.

Для цитирования: Wang Chao, Wu Daixi, Wang Aolin, Zhang Xiaojia, Duan Jianghui, Dong Mingrui, Li Mingxiao, Qi Zhirong, Cui Huijuan. Leptomeningeal metastasis from colon cancer: a case report and review of literature.. Frontiers in oncology. 2026. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2026.1935585.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.