medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
Cognitive screening biases in a secondary prevention Alzheimer's disease clinical trial.
СтатьяПрепринтНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sai Isha, Grill Joshua D, Younes Kyan, Winer Joseph R, Cody Karly A, Sperling Reisa, Mormino Elizabeth C, Young Christina B
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Alzheimer's disease (AD) prevention trials have multiple screening steps to identify cognitively unimpaired individuals with AD biomarker evidence. Cognitive/functional screening tests may be biased in underrepresented groups, thereby impacting trial eligibility.
METHODS: 6669 participants screened for the Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer's (A4) study were grouped by ethnoracial background and testing language. Ethnoracial/language differences in ineligibility reason, cognitive/functional test performance, and amyloid positivity rates were examined.
RESULTS: Ethnoracial minorities were least likely to meet eligibility criteria. Patterns of incorrect Mini-Mental State Examination items and impaired Clinical Dementia Rating functional domains differed between groups excluded for impaired cognition/function, suggesting test biases. The Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test yielded more similar exclusion rates across groups than Logical Memory. Cognitive/functional screening biases may impact subsequent biomarker screening as amyloid positivity rates were lowest in ethnoracial minorities.
DISCUSSION: Biases in cognitive/functional screening tests may disproportionately exclude ethnoracial minorities in AD prevention trials.
METHODS: 6669 participants screened for the Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer's (A4) study were grouped by ethnoracial background and testing language. Ethnoracial/language differences in ineligibility reason, cognitive/functional test performance, and amyloid positivity rates were examined.
RESULTS: Ethnoracial minorities were least likely to meet eligibility criteria. Patterns of incorrect Mini-Mental State Examination items and impaired Clinical Dementia Rating functional domains differed between groups excluded for impaired cognition/function, suggesting test biases. The Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test yielded more similar exclusion rates across groups than Logical Memory. Cognitive/functional screening biases may impact subsequent biomarker screening as amyloid positivity rates were lowest in ethnoracial minorities.
DISCUSSION: Biases in cognitive/functional screening tests may disproportionately exclude ethnoracial minorities in AD prevention trials.