MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0950-821x(05)80591-2

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of vascular surgery · 1994

Magnetic resonance angiography or IADSA for diagnosis of carotid pseudo occlusion?

Currie I C, Murphy K P, Jones A J, Cole S E, Wakeley C J, Wilson Y G, Baird R N, Lamont P M

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Accurate diagnosis of internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion is essential in the investigation of carotid disease yet may be difficult using Duplex. Traditionally contrast arteriography has been used to confirm the diagnosis despite its cost and potential dangers. Twenty-one patients with 23 ICA occlusions were evaluated by a 3-dimensional time of flight magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) technique. The cervical carotids and circle of Willis were imaged during the MRA examination which lasted 30 minutes. Confirmatory conventional angiography was performed in all patients. Using angiography as the gold standard, all occlusions were correctly diagnosed by MRA and 22 of 23 occlusions correctly diagnosed by Duplex. There was good agreement between MRA and angiography for all 42 ICAs imaged (Kappa statistic 0.83). Diagnosis of internal carotid artery occlusion is critical as it determines the need for operation. In this situation MRA provides a useful non-invasive complement to Duplex. A combination of non-invasive studies may enable arteriography to be rejected with greater confidence in this high risk group.

Для цитирования: Currie I C, Murphy K P, Jones A J, Cole S E, Wakeley C J, Wilson Y G, Baird R N, Lamont P M. Magnetic resonance angiography or IADSA for diagnosis of carotid pseudo occlusion?. European journal of vascular surgery. 1994. DOI: 10.1016/s0950-821x(05)80591-2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.