Kidney medicine · 2025
Variations in Center-level Practices Across US Transplant Centers Are Associated With Time to Relisting and Retransplantation in Patients With Graft Failure.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ku Elaine, Adey Deborah B, Lopez Isabelle, Lee Brian K, Lin Feng, Whelan Adrian M, McCulloch Charles E, Weir Matthew R, Chen Ling-Xin, Ahearn Patrick, Gill John, Kim Sang Joseph, Johansen Kirsten L
Аннотация
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: There is known variability in the management of kidney transplant recipients facing graft failure. We hypothesized that variations in the timing of care transitions, immunosuppression weaning, and re-evaluation processes would be associated with differential access to retransplantation and relisting.
STUDY DESIGN: An observational study.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Survey directed at medical directors of US transplant centers.
EXPOSURES: Transplant center-reported practices.
OUTCOMES: Time to retransplantation (and secondarily, relisting) after graft failure.
ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Adjusted proportional hazards models with clustering by transplant center.
RESULTS: Of the 178 surveyed centers, 77 unique transplant centers (43%) responded. Respondents reported significant variability in the timing of transition of patients back to general nephrologists (ranging from within 1 year of transplantation to never), weaning of immunosuppression with graft failure, and approach to assessments of frailty and adherence during the evaluation for relisting. Transplant centers that transitioned patients back to general nephrologists >3 to <5 years after transplant had lower likelihood of retransplantation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.88) and relisting (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.75-0.85) compared with centers that transitioned patients earlier (between 1-3 years of transplantation). Transplant centers that did not oversee weaning of immunosuppression after graft failure had patients with a lower likelihood of retransplantation (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.79-0.99) and relisting (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.82-0.95) compared with centers that oversaw this weaning. Withdrawal of immunosuppression 12-24 months after return to dialysis was associated with a higher likelihood of retransplantation (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.14-1.43) and relisting (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.26) compared with withdrawal of immunosuppression within 6 months of graft failure.
LIMITATIONS: Observational nature of data and potential for residual confounding.
CONCLUSIONS: There is significant variation in the management of patients with graft failure across US transplant centers during the transition of care, and this variation was associated with differential access of patients to retransplantation and relisting.
STUDY DESIGN: An observational study.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Survey directed at medical directors of US transplant centers.
EXPOSURES: Transplant center-reported practices.
OUTCOMES: Time to retransplantation (and secondarily, relisting) after graft failure.
ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Adjusted proportional hazards models with clustering by transplant center.
RESULTS: Of the 178 surveyed centers, 77 unique transplant centers (43%) responded. Respondents reported significant variability in the timing of transition of patients back to general nephrologists (ranging from within 1 year of transplantation to never), weaning of immunosuppression with graft failure, and approach to assessments of frailty and adherence during the evaluation for relisting. Transplant centers that transitioned patients back to general nephrologists >3 to <5 years after transplant had lower likelihood of retransplantation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.88) and relisting (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.75-0.85) compared with centers that transitioned patients earlier (between 1-3 years of transplantation). Transplant centers that did not oversee weaning of immunosuppression after graft failure had patients with a lower likelihood of retransplantation (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.79-0.99) and relisting (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.82-0.95) compared with centers that oversaw this weaning. Withdrawal of immunosuppression 12-24 months after return to dialysis was associated with a higher likelihood of retransplantation (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.14-1.43) and relisting (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.26) compared with withdrawal of immunosuppression within 6 months of graft failure.
LIMITATIONS: Observational nature of data and potential for residual confounding.
CONCLUSIONS: There is significant variation in the management of patients with graft failure across US transplant centers during the transition of care, and this variation was associated with differential access of patients to retransplantation and relisting.